FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   >>  
man mind, or derived its leading and suggestive features from _foreign lands_? There is intermingled with these inquiries, the scarcely less important one, whether or not, the _antiquarian ruins of America_, denote an element or elements of _European population_, in the later eras, whose fate became involved in the hunter mass, and who may be supposed to have been completely obliterated from the traditions of the existing tribes, prior to the discovery by Columbus. Indian tradition has little or nothing to offer on this head. Time and barbarism have blotted out all. The entire sum of the traditions of all the various races of Red men, on the continent, when sifted from the mass of fabulous and incongruous matter by which it is accompanied, and when there is any allusion to it at all, amounts to this: that their ancestors came from the east; a few tribes, assert that they had come by water.[9] The land from whence they set out, the time devoted to the purposes of their long migration, and the actual period of their landing, and all such questions, are indefinite. And we must re-construct their chronology, in the best way possible, from a careful system of patient historical and antiquarian induction. Exactitude it cannot have, but it may reach plausibility. Granting to the Scandinavian, the Cimbrian and the Italian periods of adventure, which have been named, the fullest limits, in point of antiquity, which have under any circumstances been claimed, we cannot carry even this species of history beyond the year A. D. 1001; leaving 999 years to be accounted for, to the commencement of the Christian era. The Aztec empire which had reached such a point of magnificence when Mexico was first entered by Cortez, in 1519, did not, according to the picture writings and Mexican chronologists, date back farther than 1038, or by another authority, 958. The Toltecs, who preceded them in the career of empire, and whom together with the Chichimecs and their allies they overthrew, do not, allowing them the most liberal latitude of authors, extend their reign beyond A. D. 667. Prior to this, Indian chronology makes mention of the Olmecs--a people who are described as having mechanical arts, and to whom even the Toltecs ascribed the erection of some of their most antique and magnificent monuments. According to Fernando D'Alva, himself of Aztec lineage, the most ancient date assigned to the entire group of Mexican dynasties is A. D. 299. Th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   >>  



Top keywords:
traditions
 
tribes
 

Indian

 

entire

 

Mexican

 

empire

 

Toltecs

 

chronology

 

antiquarian

 
entered

Cortez
 

Mexico

 

foreign

 

features

 

reached

 
magnificence
 

picture

 

farther

 
leading
 

chronologists


writings

 

suggestive

 

circumstances

 

claimed

 
species
 

antiquity

 

fullest

 

limits

 

history

 

intermingled


accounted
 
commencement
 
leaving
 

Christian

 

erection

 
antique
 

magnificent

 

ascribed

 

mechanical

 
monuments

According

 
dynasties
 

assigned

 

ancient

 

Fernando

 
lineage
 
people
 
Olmecs
 

Chichimecs

 
allies