FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   >>  
with a palpable bait May look a great fool; but I guess we must wait,-- Before we bemock him as crass and absurd,-- To see--what effect it will have on the Bird! The trial's well timed, and the bait looks "not bad;" The Boy _may_ "know his book," though he's only a lad. Birds sometimes fall victims to Boys on the prowl, And the Voter Bird is _not_ the wariest fowl. The Voter Bird shortly must show what he's worth He may be the stupidest dicky on earth, Predestinate victim to salt-pinch or net; But then he may _not_,--and he is "not caught _yet_!" * * * * * AN AUTOCRAT'S ASPIRATION.--Pan-Slavism for Holy Russia, and Pan-Slav(e)ism for the rest of Europe. * * * * * LAND AND BRAIN. (_A PAGE FROM A VADE MECUM FOR POLITICAL ECONOMISTS._) _Question_. Can you tell me how long an Author has a right to the profits arising out of his literary labours? _Answer_. Forty-two years, or the term of his natural life plus seven years further, whichever may be the longer. _Q._ And should Lord MONKSWELL's Copyright Bill, which has been read a First Time in the House of Peers, become law, will not this right be extended to thirty years after the death of the Author? _A._ It will, to his great advantage. The same measure contains other valuable provisions to secure to the Author the just profit of his brain-work. _Q._ But will not these advantages be purchased at the price of a loss to the general good? _A._ Very likely--the community will suffer for the benefit of the individual. _Q._ In like manner a Patentee, who invents a most useful article, enjoys (for a consideration) a monopoly of its sale, does he not? _A._ For fourteen years. This enables him to recoup himself for the thought and labour he has employed in the most useful article's construction. _Q._ If Author and Inventor were allowed an absolute monopoly of the profits arising out of their brain-work, it would be immoral? _A._ No doubt, as the individuals would benefit at the cost of the community. _Q._ Why should a butterman, then, have an absolute right in the sale of his butter? _A._ Because butter is butter, and brains are merely brains. _Q._ And would it not be for the benefit of the community if the landowner of a freehold were deprived of his rights after a term of years, and his hold
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   >>  



Top keywords:

Author

 

butter

 

community

 

benefit

 

arising

 
absolute
 

monopoly

 

article

 

profits

 

brains


purchased
 

advantages

 

general

 

measure

 

thirty

 

valuable

 

provisions

 
advantage
 

extended

 

profit


secure

 

invents

 

individuals

 

immoral

 

Inventor

 

allowed

 
palpable
 
butterman
 

freehold

 
deprived

rights

 

landowner

 

Because

 
construction
 

enjoys

 

consideration

 

Patentee

 

manner

 
individual
 

thought


labour

 

employed

 

recoup

 

enables

 

fourteen

 

suffer

 
Before
 
stupidest
 

wariest

 

shortly