FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105  
106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   >>   >|  
by his fellows. Yet after twenty-one all are held equally responsible--unless they're actually insane. It isn't equity! In theory no man or animal should be subject to the power of discretionary punishment on the part of another--even his own father or master. I've often wondered what earthly right we have to make the animals work for us--to bind them to slavery when we denounce slavery as a crime. It would horrify us to see a human being put up and sold at auction. Yet we tear the families of animals apart, subject them to lives of toil, and kill them whenever we see fit. We say we do this because their intelligence is limited and they cannot exercise any discrimination in their conduct, that they are always in the zone of irresponsibility and so have no rights. But I've seen animals that were shrewder than men, and men who were vastly less intelligent than animals." "Right-o!" assented Tutt. "Take Scraggs, for instance. He's no more responsible than a chipmunk." "Nevertheless, the law has always been consistent," said Mr. Tutt, "and has never discriminated between animals any more than it has between men on the ground of varying degrees of intelligence. They used to try 'em all, big and little, wild and domesticated, mammals and invertebrates." "Oh, come!" exclaimed Tutt. "I may not know much law, but--" "Between 1120 and 1740 they prosecuted in France alone no less than ninety-two animals. The last one was a cow." "A cow hasn't much intelligence," observed Tutt. "And they tried fleas," added Mr. Tutt. "They have a lot!" commented his junior partner. "I knew a flea once, who--" "They had a regular form of procedure," continued Mr. Tutt, brushing the flea aside, "which was adhered to with the utmost technical accuracy. You could try an individual animal, either in person or by proxy, or you could try a whole family, swarm or herd. If a town was infested by rats, for example, they first assigned counsel--an advocate, he was called--and then the defendants were summoned three times publicly to appear. If they didn't show up on the third and last call they were tried _in absentia_, and if convicted were ordered out of the country before a certain date under penalty of being exorcised." "What happened if they were exorcised?" asked Tutt curiously. "It depended a good deal on the local power of Satan," answered the old lawyer dryly. "Sometimes they became even more prolific and destructive than they we
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105  
106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

animals

 
intelligence
 

animal

 

slavery

 

responsible

 

exorcised

 

subject

 

procedure

 
continued
 

brushing


technical

 

utmost

 

accuracy

 

adhered

 

individual

 
partner
 

ninety

 

France

 
Between
 

prosecuted


observed

 

person

 

regular

 

junior

 
commented
 

penalty

 

happened

 

ordered

 

convicted

 

country


curiously

 

depended

 
Sometimes
 
prolific
 

destructive

 

lawyer

 

answered

 

absentia

 

assigned

 

counsel


infested

 
family
 

advocate

 

publicly

 

called

 

defendants

 

summoned

 

auction

 
families
 
horrify