FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57  
58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   >>  
out and give them all the travelled part of the road. No doubt a lightly loaded vehicle can often turn out with less inconvenience than a heavily loaded one, and generally every thoughtful and considerate driver of a light vehicle is willing to, and does, give the heavy vehicle more than half the road on every proper occasion; but the driver of the heavy vehicle ought to understand that it is done out of courtesy to himself and consideration for his horses, and not because it is required by any rule of law. The statute law of the road in this State makes no distinction between the lightly and the heavily loaded vehicle. Both alike are required to pass to the right of the travelled part of the road. In case of accident the court would undoubtedly take into consideration the size and load of each vehicle, as bearing upon the question of the conduct of the drivers under the circumstances, and their responsibility would be settled in accordance with "the law of the road," modified and possibly reversed by the situation of the parties and the circumstances surrounding them at the time.[44] [43] 4 Pick. 125; 8 Met. 213. [44] 111 Mass. 360. A traveller in a common carriage may use the track of a street railway when the same is not in use by the company; but the company is entitled to the unrestricted use of their rails upon all proper occasions, and then such traveller must keep off their track, or else he renders himself liable to indictment under the statutes of the State.[45] [45] Pub. St. c. 113, Sec. 37; 7 Allen, 573. CHAPTER XI. EQUESTRIANS AND PEDESTRIANS. In England "the law of the road" applies as well to equestrians as to travellers by carriage, and I can see no good reason why it should not do so here. The statutes are silent on the subject, and I cannot find that our Supreme Court has ever had occasion to pass upon the question; but it has been decided in some of the States that when a traveller on horseback meets another equestrian or a carriage, he may exercise his own notions of prudence, and turn either to the right or to the left at his option.[46] By common consent and immemorial usage an equestrian is expected to yield the road, or a good share of it, to a wagon or other vehicle. It has been decided in Pennsylvania that if he has a chance to turn out and refuses to do so, and his steed or himself is injured by a collision, he is remediless.[47] [46] 24 Wend
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57  
58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   >>  



Top keywords:

vehicle

 

traveller

 

carriage

 

loaded

 
equestrian
 

lightly

 

common

 

circumstances

 

question

 

decided


travelled

 

statutes

 

occasion

 
heavily
 
proper
 
company
 

driver

 

required

 

consideration

 

silent


applies

 

CHAPTER

 

travellers

 
equestrians
 

PEDESTRIANS

 

reason

 
England
 
EQUESTRIANS
 

expected

 
immemorial

Pennsylvania
 

remediless

 
collision
 

injured

 
chance
 

refuses

 

consent

 
States
 

Supreme

 

horseback


option

 
prudence
 

notions

 

exercise

 
indictment
 

subject

 

distinction

 

statute

 
undoubtedly
 

accident