FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147  
148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   >>   >|  
that no man was ever a better, more honourable, or kinder colleague, more anxious to smooth differences and adjust disputes; that _he_ could not attack him in the House of Commons, neither would Stanley; that Peel, who hated him, would not dislike doing so, but that he was too cautious to trust implicitly to Urquhart's assertions, and to commit himself by acting on them; that there was nobody else capable of dealing with the subject well, and that Canning[22] ought not, for the same reasons (only much stronger in his case) that restrained himself and Stanley. [20] [King William's Private Secretary.] [21] The truth never was manifested, the matter blew over, very little ever was said about it in the newspapers, Urquhart's revelations never appeared, the public forgot it, and the whole affair died a natural death.-- January 6th, 1839. [22] [Sir Stratford Canning, afterwards Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, was at this time a Member of the House of Commons.] The bishops were at loggerheads in the House of Lords the other night on the Ecclesiastical Discipline Bill. Exeter (Phillpotts), in a most venomous speech, attacked the Archbishop, whose mildness was stimulated into an angry reply; but Exeter gained his point, for both Brougham and the Duke were for postponing the Bill. Phillpotts would have made a great bishop in the days of Bonner and Gardiner, or he would have been a Becket, or, still better, a Pope either in the palmy days of papal power or during the important period of reaction which succeeded the Reformation. He seems cast in the mould of a Sixtus. August 3rd, 1838 {p.120} The following panegyric on the sixth volume of the Duke's Despatches, evidently written by no common hand, was given by Dr. Ferguson to Edward Villiers,[23] the Doctor not knowing the author:-- 'The sixth volume appears to me among the most extraordinary of human productions, ancient or modern. It is not the mere power of sagacity, vigilance, acute and comprehensive reasoning, or, in short, the intellectual perfection of the book, various and wonderful as it is, which affects my mind most deeply: it is the love of justice, the love of truth, the love of humanity, the love of country, the fine temper, the tolerance of error, the mildness of reproof, the _superb morality_ of the great and masculine spirit displaye
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147  
148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Urquhart
 

Stratford

 

Canning

 

Exeter

 

Commons

 

Phillpotts

 

volume

 

mildness

 

Stanley

 
August

Despatches

 
panegyric
 

Sixtus

 
Bonner
 

Gardiner

 

Becket

 
bishop
 

Brougham

 

postponing

 
evidently

period
 

reaction

 
succeeded
 

important

 

Reformation

 
affects
 

deeply

 

wonderful

 

intellectual

 

perfection


justice
 
humanity
 

morality

 

superb

 

masculine

 

spirit

 

displaye

 

reproof

 
country
 

temper


tolerance

 
reasoning
 

comprehensive

 

Villiers

 

Doctor

 
knowing
 

author

 

Edward

 

Ferguson

 

common