28, indicates the works where the text may be
found. Cf. A. SS., p. 839.
[11] The title sufficiently indicated the contents: _Domenico
priori S. Romani tolosani ejusque fratribus, eos in protectionem
recipit eorumque Ordinem cum bonis et privilegiis confirmat_.
_Religiosam vitam_: December 22, 1216; Pressuti, t. i., 175,
text in Horoy t. ii., col. 141-144.
[12] Vide A. SS., pp. 608 ff. and 838 ff.
[13] Vide Bull _Multi divinae_ of August 13, 1218. Horoy, t.
iii., col. 12; Potthast, 5891.
[14] The contradiction is so striking that the Bollandists have
made of it the principal argument for defending the error in
their manuscript (1 Cel., 75), and insisting in the face of, and
against everything that Francis had taken that journey. A. SS.,
607.
[15] He died at Cahors, October 31, 1272. His legend is found in
MS. Riccardi, 279, f^o. 69a. _Incipit vita f. Christophori quam
compilavit fr. Bernardus de Bessa custodiae Caturcensis: Quasi
vas auri solidum._ Cf. Mark of Lisbon, t. ii., pp. 106-113, t.
iii., p. 212, and Glassberger, _An. fr._, t. ii., p. 14.
[16] A. SS., Aprilis, t. iii., p. 224; _Conform._, 118b, 1; 54a;
Mark of Lisbon, t. ii., p. 1--Brother Luke had been sent to
Constantinople, in 1219, at latest. Vide _Constitutus_ of
December 9, 1220. Sbaralea, _Bull. fr._, t. i., p. 6; Potthast,
6431.
[17] We owe to M. Mueller (_Anfaenge_, p. 207) the honor of this
publication, copied from a manuscript of the Cottoniana.
[18] Giord., 8.
[19] 1 Cel., 57; Bon., 133-138; 154 and 155; 2 Cel., 2, 2;
_Conform._, 113b, 2; 114a, 2; _Spec._, 55b; _Fior._, 24.
[20] _Conform._, 113b, 2; cf. A. SS., p. 611.
[21] 2 Cel., 3, 92; _Spec._, 30b. Cf. 2 Cel., 3, 115.
_Conform._, 142b, 1. This incident may possibly have taken place
on the return.
[22] With the facilities of that period the voyage required from
twenty to thirty days. The _diarium_ of a similar passage may be
found in Huillard-Breholles, _Hist. Dipl._, t. i., 898-901. Cf.
_Ibid._, Introd., p. cccxxxi.
[23] 2 Cel., 22; Bon 154, 155; cf. A. SS., p. 612.
[24] Jacques de Vitry speaks only incidentally of Francis here
in the midst of salutations; from the critical point of view
this only enhances the value of his words. See the Study of the
|