FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223  
224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   >>   >|  
that in consequence of the said imputed evasion he indicated a disposition to attach such a forfeiture as in justice could only have followed from a gross breach of treaty,--though the said Hastings did not then pretend any actual infringement even of the least among the conditions to which, in the name of the Company, he, the said Hastings, was the executive guaranty. III. That, however "the number of troops stipulated by treaty may have been understood," at the period of the original demand, "to be five thousand horse," yet the said Warren Hastings, at the time when he recorded the supposed evasion of Fyzoola Khan's answer to the said demand, could not be unacquainted with the express words of the stipulation, as a letter of the Vizier, inserted in the same Consultation, refers the Governor-General to inclosed copies "of all engagements entered into by the late Vizier and by himself [the reigning Vizier] with Fyzoola Khan," and that the treaty itself, therefore, was at the very moment before the said Warren Hastings: which treaty (as the said Hastings observed with respect to another treaty, in the case of another person) "most assuredly does not contain a syllable to justify his conduct; but, by the unexampled latitude which he assumes in his constructions, he may, if he pleases, extort this or any other meaning from any part of it."[25] IV. That the Vizier himself appears by no means to have been persuaded of his own right to five thousand horse under the treaty,--since, in his correspondence on the subject, he, the Vizier, nowhere mentions the treaty as the ground of his demand, except where he is recapitulating to the Governor-General, Warren Hastings, the substance of his, the said Hastings's, own letters; on the contrary, the Vizier hints his apprehensions lest Fyzoola Khan should appeal to the treaty against the demand, as a breach thereof,--in which case, he, the Vizier, informs the said Hastings of the projected reply. "Should Fyzoola Khan" (says the Vizier) "mention anything of the tenor of the treaty, _the first breach of it has been committed by him_, in keeping up more men than allowed of by the treaty: _I have accordingly sent a person to settle that point also_. In case he should mention to me anything respecting the treaty, I will then reproach him with having kept up too many troops, and will oblige him to send the five thousand horse": thereby clearly intimating, that, as a remonstrance against th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223  
224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
treaty
 

Hastings

 

Vizier

 

demand

 

Fyzoola

 
thousand
 

Warren

 
breach
 

General

 
troops

Governor
 

mention

 

person

 

evasion

 
subject
 
mentions
 

correspondence

 

oblige

 

recapitulating

 
substance

ground
 

intimating

 

meaning

 

appears

 
remonstrance
 

letters

 
persuaded
 

settle

 

keeping

 

allowed


committed

 
appeal
 
apprehensions
 
thereof
 
Should
 
respecting
 

reproach

 
informs
 

projected

 
contrary

number

 

guaranty

 
executive
 
conditions
 

Company

 

stipulated

 
understood
 

recorded

 

supposed

 

answer