tant the committee finally gave a reluctant assent.
In open session a majority of Democrats favored the bill. Many of them
made it their own. They passed it. There was belief that Justice David
Davis, who was expected to become a member of the commission, was
sure for Tilden. If, under this surmise, he had been, the political
complexion of "8 to 7" would have been reversed.
Elected to the United States Senate from Illinois, Judge Davis declined
to serve, and Mr. Justice Bradley was chosen for the commission in his
place.
The day after the inauguration of Hayes my kinsman, Stanley Matthews,
said to me: "You people wanted Judge Davis. So did we. I tell you what I
know, that Judge Davis was as safe for us as Judge Bradley. We preferred
him because he carried more weight."
The subsequent career of Judge Davis in the Senate gave conclusive proof
that this was true.
When the consideration of the disputed votes before the commission
had proceeded far enough to demonstrate the likelihood that its final
decision would be for Hayes a movement of obstruction and delay, a
filibuster, was organized by about forty Democratic members of the
House. It proved rather turbulent than effective. The South stood very
nearly solid for carrying out the agreement in good faith.
Toward the close the filibuster received what appeared formidable
reinforcement from the Louisiana delegation. This was in reality merely
a bluff, intended to induce the Hayes people to make certain concessions
touching their State government. It had the desired effect. Satisfactory
assurances having been given, the count proceeded to the end--a very
bitter end indeed for the Democrats.
The final conference between the Louisianans and the accredited
representatives of Mr. Hayes was held at Wormley's Hotel and came to be
called "the Wormley Conference." It was the subject of uncommon interest
and heated controversy at the time and long afterward. Without knowing
why or for what purpose, I was asked to be present by my colleague, Mr.
Ellis, of Louisiana, and later in the day the same invitation came to me
from the Republicans through Mr. Garfield. Something was said about my
serving as a referee.
Just before the appointed hour Gen. M. C. Butler, of South Carolina,
afterward so long a Senator in Congress, said to me: "This meeting is
called to enable Louisiana to make terms with Hayes. South Carolina is
as deeply concerned as Louisiana, but we have nobody t
|