hose worn by
Mr. Inglethorp"--these were exhibited--"secondly, this phial."
The phial was that already recognized by the chemist's assistant, a tiny
bottle of blue glass, containing a few grains of a white crystalline
powder, and labelled: "Strychnine Hydrochloride. POISON."
A fresh piece of evidence discovered by the detectives since the police
court proceedings was a long, almost new piece of blotting-paper. It had
been found in Mrs. Inglethorp's cheque book, and on being reversed at
a mirror, showed clearly the words: ". . . erything of which I die
possessed I leave to my beloved husband Alfred Ing..." This placed
beyond question the fact that the destroyed will had been in favour of
the deceased lady's husband. Japp then produced the charred fragment
of paper recovered from the grate, and this, with the discovery of the
beard in the attic, completed his evidence.
But Sir Ernest's cross-examination was yet to come.
"What day was it when you searched the prisoner's room?"
"Tuesday, the 24th of July."
"Exactly a week after the tragedy?"
"Yes."
"You found these two objects, you say, in the chest of drawers. Was the
drawer unlocked?"
"Yes."
"Does it not strike you as unlikely that a man who had committed a
crime should keep the evidence of it in an unlocked drawer for anyone to
find?"
"He might have stowed them there in a hurry."
"But you have just said it was a whole week since the crime. He would
have had ample time to remove them and destroy them."
"Perhaps."
"There is no perhaps about it. Would he, or would he not have had plenty
of time to remove and destroy them?"
"Yes."
"Was the pile of underclothes under which the things were hidden heavy
or light?"
"Heavyish."
"In other words, it was winter underclothing. Obviously, the prisoner
would not be likely to go to that drawer?"
"Perhaps not."
"Kindly answer my question. Would the prisoner, in the hottest week of a
hot summer, be likely to go to a drawer containing winter underclothing.
Yes, or no?"
"No."
"In that case, is it not possible that the articles in question might
have been put there by a third person, and that the prisoner was quite
unaware of their presence?"
"I should not think it likely."
"But it is possible?"
"Yes."
"That is all."
More evidence followed. Evidence as to the financial difficulties in
which the prisoner had found himself at the end of July. Evidence as
to his intrigue with M
|