FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   >>  
_concinnus_, the latter including the populations of the northwest coast in Oregon, Washington and British Columbia. Subsequent more detailed studies by later workers with more abundant material led to the recognition of some subspecies that Ruthven thought invalid and led to the resurrection of some names that he had placed in synonomy. Van Denburgh and Slevin (1918:198) recognized _infernalis_ as the subspecies occurring over most of California and southern Oregon, differing from more northern populations in having more numerous ventrals and caudals and a paler ground color. Fitch (1941:575) revived the name _pickeringii_ for a melanistic population of western Washington and southwestern British Columbia, restricting the name _concinnus_ to a red-headed and melanistic population of northwestern Oregon, and restricting the name _infernalis_ to a pale-colored population in the coastal strip of California. These changes left most of the populations formerly included in _concinnus_ and _infernalis_ without a name, and Fitch (_op. cit._) revived _Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia_ (Cope) to apply to them. However, Fox (1951:257) demonstrated that the type of _T. s. tetrataenia_ came from the San Francisco peninsula (rather than from "Pit River, California" as erroneously stated in the original description) and that the name was applicable to a localized peninsular population rather than to the wide-ranging far western subspecies, which he named _T. s. fitchi_. The range of _fitchi_ includes California west of the Colorado and Mohave deserts (except for the narrow strip of coast occupied by _infernalis_ and _tetrataenia_), Oregon except the northwestern part, Washington east of the Cascade Range, most of British Columbia, extreme southeastern Alaska (occurring farther north than any other terrestrial reptile of North America) and parts of Idaho. Neither Fox (1951) nor Fitch (1941) defined the eastern limits of _fitchi_ or discussed its relationship to the subspecies _parietalis_. Wright and Wright (1957:849) stated: "Fitch ... did not even mention the big scrap basket form _parietalis_, from which he pulled _T. s. fitchi_ (old _tetrataenia_). That comparison remains to be made, and the east boundary of _fitchi_ and the west boundary of _parietalis_ are still nebulous." We have undertaken to define better than has been done before the ranges of _parietalis_ and _fitchi_ and to list the diagnostic characters separating t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   >>  



Top keywords:
fitchi
 
tetrataenia
 
population
 
subspecies
 

infernalis

 

California

 

parietalis

 

Oregon

 

populations

 

concinnus


Columbia

 

Washington

 

British

 

melanistic

 

revived

 

Wright

 

boundary

 
stated
 
northwestern
 

restricting


occurring

 

western

 
Neither
 

America

 

terrestrial

 

reptile

 
defined
 

relationship

 

northwest

 
discussed

eastern

 
limits
 

deserts

 

Subsequent

 
narrow
 

Mohave

 

Colorado

 

includes

 

detailed

 

occupied


southeastern

 
Alaska
 
farther
 

extreme

 

Cascade

 

including

 

define

 

undertaken

 

nebulous

 
characters