w, I have received your note addressed
to Wolverhampton. We left the men there last night, and they brought it
on with them at noon to-day.
The maimed gasman's foot is much swollen, but he limps about and does
his work. I have doctored him up with arnica. During the "Boy" last
night there was an escape of gas from the side of my top batten, which
caught the copper-wire and was within a thread of bringing down the
heavy reflector into the stalls. It was a very ticklish matter, though
the audience knew nothing about it. I saw it, and the gasman and Dolby
saw it, and stood at that side of the platform in agonies. We all three
calculated that there would be just time to finish and save it; when the
gas was turned out the instant I had done, the whole thing was at its
very last and utmost extremity. Whom it would have tumbled on, or what
might have been set on fire, it is impossible to say.
I hope you rewarded your police escort on Tuesday night. It was the most
tremendous night I ever saw at Chester.
[Sidenote: Miss Dickens.]
LEEDS, _Friday, Feb. 1st, 1867._
We got here prosperously, and had a good (but not great) house for
"Barbox" and "Boy" last night. For "Marigold" and "Trial," to-night,
everything is gone. And I even have my doubts of the possibility of
Dolby's cramming the people in. For "Marigold" and "Trial" at
Manchester, to-morrow, we also expect a fine hall.
I shall be at the office for next Wednesday. If Charley Collins should
have been got to Gad's, I will come there for that day. If not, I
suppose we had best open the official bower again.
This is a beastly place, with a very good hotel. Except Preston, it is
one of the nastiest places I know. The room is like a capacious coal
cellar, and is incredibly filthy; but for sound it is perfect.
[Sidenote: Anonymous.]
OFFICE OF "ALL THE YEAR ROUND," _Tuesday, Feb. 5th, 1867._
DEAR SIR,
I have looked at the larger half of the first volume of your novel, and
have pursued the more difficult points of the story through the other
two volumes.
You will, of course, receive my opinion as that of an individual writer
and student of art, who by no means claims to be infallible.
I think you are too ambitious, and that you have not sufficient
knowledge of life or character to venture on so comprehensive an
attempt. Evidences of inexperience in every way, and of your power being
far below the situa
|