FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   >>  
ne on grounds that will prove him not to be the other. Everyone is both himself and all his direct ancestors and descendants as well; therefore, if we would be logical, he is one also with all his cousins, no matter how distant, for he and they are alike identical with the primordial cell, and we have already noted it as an axiom that things which are identical with the same are identical with one another. This is practically making him one with all living things, whether animal or vegetable, that ever have existed or ever will--something of all which may have been in the mind of Sophocles when he wrote:-- "Nor seest thou yet the gathering hosts of ill That shall en-one thee both with thine own self And with thine offspring." And all this has come of admitting that a man may be the same person for two days running! As for sopping common sense it will be enough to say that these remarks are to be taken in a strictly scientific sense, and have no appreciable importance as regards life and conduct. True they deal with the foundations on which all life and conduct are based, but like other foundations they are hidden out of sight, and the sounder they are, the less we trouble ourselves about them. What other main common features between heredity and memory may we note besides the fact that neither can exist without that kind of physical continuity which we call personal identity? First, the development of the embryo proceeds in an established order; so must all habitual actions based on memory. Disturb the normal order and the performance is arrested. The better we know "God save the Queen," the less easily can we play or sing it backwards. The return of memory again depends on the return of ideas associated with the particular thing that is remembered--we remember nothing but for the presence of these, and when enough of these are presented to us we remember everything. So, if the development of an embryo is due to memory, we should suppose the memory of the impregnate ovum to revert not to yesterday, when it was in the persons of its parents, but to the last occasion on which it was an impregnate ovum. The return of the old environment and the presence of old associations would at once involve recollection of the course that should be next taken, and the same should happen throughout the whole course of development. The actual course of development presents precisely the phenomena agreeable with this.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   >>  



Top keywords:
memory
 

development

 

identical

 

return

 

common

 

presence

 

remember

 

impregnate

 

embryo

 
conduct

foundations

 

things

 

arrested

 

direct

 

performance

 

backwards

 

depends

 
normal
 
easily
 
actions

personal

 

identity

 

continuity

 

physical

 

habitual

 

ancestors

 

descendants

 

proceeds

 
established
 

Disturb


involve
 
recollection
 

associations

 
occasion
 
grounds
 
environment
 

precisely

 

phenomena

 
agreeable
 
presents

actual
 

happen

 

parents

 
presented
 
remembered
 

persons

 

yesterday

 

revert

 

Everyone

 

suppose