FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197  
198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   >>   >|  
Belem owes its three aisles of equal height to his initiative even though they were actually carried out by some one else. Judging also from the style, for the windows show many well-known Manoelino features, while the detail of the great south door is more purely Gothic, they too and the walls may be the work of Boutaca or of Lourenco Fernandes, while the great door is almost certainly that of Joao de Castilho. In any case, when Joao de Castilho came the building was not nearly finished, for in 1522 he received a thousand cruzados towards building columns and the transept vault.[130] But even more important to the decoration of the building than either Boutaca or Joao de Castilho was the coming of Master Nicolas, the Frenchman[131] whom we shall see at work at Coimbra and at Sao Marcos. Belem seems to have been the first place to which he came after leaving home, and we soon find him at work there on the statues of the great south door, and later on those of the west door, where, with the exception of the Italian door at Cintra, is carved what is probably the earliest piece of renaissance detail in the country. The south door, except for a band of carving round each entrance, is free of renaissance detail, and so was probably built before Nicolas added the statues, but in the western a few such details begin to appear, and in these, as in the band round the other openings, he may have had a hand. Inside renaissance detail is more in evidence, but since the great piers would not be carved till after they were built, it is more likely that the renaissance work there is due to Joao de Castilho himself and to what he had learned either from Nicolas or [Illustration: FIG. 62. TORRE DE SAO VICENTE. BELEM.] [Illustration: FIG. 63. BELEM. SACRISTY.] from the growing influence of the Coimbra School. It is, of course, also possible that when Nicolas went to Coimbra, where he was already at work in 1524, some French assistant may have stayed behind, yet the carving on the piers is rather coarser than in most French work, and so was more probably done by Portuguese working under Castilho's direction. The monastic buildings were begun after the church; but although at first renaissance forms seem supreme in the cloisters, closer inspection will show that they are practically confined to the carving on the buttresses and on the parapets of the arches thrown across from buttress to buttress. All the rest,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197  
198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Castilho

 

renaissance

 

detail

 
Nicolas
 
Coimbra
 

building

 
carving
 

French

 

statues

 

Boutaca


buttress
 

carved

 

Illustration

 

learned

 

details

 
western
 

evidence

 

Inside

 

openings

 
stayed

supreme

 
cloisters
 

closer

 

church

 

direction

 

monastic

 

buildings

 
inspection
 

thrown

 

arches


parapets

 

practically

 

confined

 

buttresses

 

School

 

influence

 

VICENTE

 

SACRISTY

 

growing

 

Portuguese


working

 

coarser

 

assistant

 

Lourenco

 

Fernandes

 

Gothic

 
Manoelino
 

features

 

purely

 

received