FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435  
436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   >>   >|  
rton, it seems to me very doubtful whether he can Claim the Salvage According to the Act of Parliament, For Salvage is understood to be a Reward to the Recaptor, who has not only rescued the Ship and Cargo out of the hands of the Enemy, but has also effectually Secured the same for the benefit of the Owners, till the safe Arrival of the Ship in a British Port, Which not having been done in the present Case, makes me doubt of Success in an Appeal from the Sentence. WILL. STRAHAN.[3] DOCTRS COMMONS, May 17, 1742. [Footnote 3: An eminent advocate, of Scottish origin, M.A. Edinburgh 1686, D.C.L. Oxford 1709, an advocate from 1710, advocate to the admiralty 1741-1748. As to Doctors' Commons, see doc. no. 102, note 2.] According to the Evidence given in this Case I am of Opinn. that the Brigantine the _Sarah_, being taken the 17th of Septemr. 1741 by a Spanish Privateer in a voyage from Barbados, and retaken on the 26th of Septemr. 1741 by the Privateer the _Revenge_ from Rhode Island, commanded by Capt. Norton, and convey'd to Boston, The Captain of the Privateer the _Revenge_ will be well entitled to Salvage for the Brigantine and her cargo, and the said vessel having been 96 Hours in possession of the Spaniards, the _Revenge_ Privatr. will be well entitled to a Moiety of the value of Ship and Cargo. The said Brigantine being seiz'd on the 4th of October by a Spanish Merchant Ship and plunder'd will not abate the _Revenge's_ Right to Salvage. If the Spanish Merchant Ship did actually give the Brigantine (on the 5th of October at the request of a Spanish Priest) to Mr. Thomas Smith, that will not barr the Salvage because such Ship could have no property in the Brigantine. I therefore think that there's good Reason for an appeal if this Case be truly stated. G. PAUL.[4] DR. COMMONS, July 10th 1742 Copy [Footnote 4: George Paul, fellow of Trinity Hall, Cambridge, a foundation specially devoted to the civil law, LL.D. Cambridge 1704, vicar-general to the archbishop of Canterbury 1714-1755, king's advocate 1727-1755.] The Right of Salvage acquir'd by the Recapture of the _Sarah_ Brigt. was not, I conceive, extinguished by its being taken again by the Spanish Merchant Ship, she not being carried _intra praesidia_,[5] but only plundered and let go. The Pretence of a Gift thereof to Captn. Smith can have no weight, for the Spanish Mercht. acquir'd no property by the Capture and could transfer none to Smit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435  
436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Spanish

 

Salvage

 

Brigantine

 

advocate

 

Revenge

 

Merchant

 
Privateer
 
acquir
 

Septemr

 

property


Cambridge

 
According
 

entitled

 

October

 
COMMONS
 

Footnote

 

Reason

 
request
 

plunder

 

Moiety


Priest

 

Thomas

 

appeal

 
Trinity
 

carried

 
praesidia
 

Recapture

 

conceive

 

extinguished

 

plundered


Capture

 

Mercht

 

transfer

 

weight

 

Pretence

 

thereof

 

George

 

fellow

 

Privatr

 

stated


foundation
 

general

 

archbishop

 

Canterbury

 

specially

 

devoted

 

voyage

 

British

 

Arrival

 

benefit