FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618  
619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   >>   >|  
e flowed from some maltreated image of Christ. _______________________ FOURTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 54, Art. 4] Whether Christ's Body Ought to Have Risen with Its Scars? Objection 1: It would seem that Christ's body ought not to have risen with its scars. For it is written (1 Cor. 15:52): "The dead shall rise incorrupt." But scars and wounds imply corruption and defect. Therefore it was not fitting for Christ, the author of the resurrection, to rise again with scars. Obj. 2: Further, Christ's body rose entire, as stated above (A. 3). But open scars are opposed to bodily integrity, since they interfere with the continuity of the tissue. It does not therefore seem fitting for the open wounds to remain in Christ's body; although the traces of the wounds might remain, which would satisfy the beholder; thus it was that Thomas believed, to whom it was said: "Because thou hast seen Me, Thomas, thou hast believed" (John 20:29). Obj. 3: Further, Damascene says (De Fide Orth. iv) that "some things are truly said of Christ after the Resurrection, which He did not have from nature but from special dispensation, such as the scars, in order to make it sure that it was the body which had suffered that rose again." Now when the cause ceases, the effect ceases. Therefore it seems that when the disciples were assured of the Resurrection, He bore the scars no longer. But it ill became the unchangeableness of His glory that He should assume anything which was not to remain in Him for ever. Consequently, it seems that He ought not at His Resurrection to have resumed a body with scars. _On the contrary,_ Our Lord said to Thomas (John 20:27): "Put in thy finger hither, and see My hands; and bring hither thy hand, and put it into My side, and be not faithless but believing." _I answer that,_ It was fitting for Christ's soul at His Resurrection to resume the body with its scars. In the first place, for Christ's own glory. For Bede says on Luke 24:40 that He kept His scars not from inability to heal them, "but to wear them as an everlasting trophy of His victory." Hence Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xxii): "Perhaps in that kingdom we shall see on the bodies of the Martyrs the traces of the wounds which they bore for Christ's name: because it will not be a deformity, but a dignity in them; and a certain kind of beauty will shine in them, in the body, though not of the body." Secondly, to confirm the hearts of the disciples as to "the fait
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618  
619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Christ
 

Resurrection

 

wounds

 

fitting

 
remain
 

Thomas

 

traces

 

Further

 

ceases

 

disciples


believed

 
Therefore
 

faithless

 

believing

 

maltreated

 

resume

 

answer

 
resumed
 

Consequently

 

assume


contrary
 

ARTICLE

 

FOURTH

 

finger

 
deformity
 

dignity

 

bodies

 
Martyrs
 

confirm

 

hearts


Secondly

 

beauty

 

kingdom

 
Perhaps
 

flowed

 

inability

 

everlasting

 

Augustine

 

trophy

 

victory


longer

 

written

 

satisfy

 

beholder

 
Because
 
tissue
 
continuity
 
entire
 

incorrupt

 

stated