FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123  
124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   >>   >|  
ffirmed, only the original and superior gods were deemed capable of incarnation in animal shape, the account is still valuable and interesting because it calls attention to a side of Tongan religion on which our principal authority, Mariner, is almost silent. That side comprises the worship of natural objects, and especially of animals, birds, and fish, regarded as embodiments of spirits, whether gods or ghosts. This worship of nature, and particularly of animated nature, was highly developed among the Samoans; it would be natural, therefore, to find the same system in vogue among their neighbours and near kinsmen the Tongans, though our authorities on Tongan religion say little about it. The system may with some appearance of probability be regarded as a relic of a former practice of totemism.[110] [110] See below, pp. 182 _sqq._, 200 _sqq._ In recent years a considerable amount of evidence bearing on the subject has been collected by Mr. E. E. V. Collocot. He distinguishes the national Tongan gods from the gods of tribes, clans, and small groups of allied households; such a group of households, it appears, formed the ordinary social unit. Indeed, he tells us that there was nothing to prevent a man from setting up a tutelary deity of his own, if he were so disposed; he might adopt almost any object for the religious reverence of his household and himself. Thus there was "a gradation in the divine hierarchy from gods of populous tribes down to deities the private possession of a very few."[111] Further, Mr. Collocot found that most of the gods had sacred animals or other natural objects associated with them,[112] and that the worshippers were generally forbidden to eat the sacred animals of their gods. He concludes that "in the period of which we have information totemism has given way to a more highly developed polytheism, but there are indications that the development was by way of totemism."[113] Among the facts which appear to support this conclusion we may note the following. [111] E. E. V. Collocot, "Notes on Tongan Religion," _Journal of the Polynesian Society_, xxx. (1921) pp. 154 _sq._, 159. [112] E. E. V. Collocot, _op. cit._ pp. 160, 161. [113] E. E. V. Collocot, _op. cit._ pp. 159 _sq._ There was a great god called Boolotoo Katoa, that is, "the whole of Boolotoo (Bolotoo)," who had the dog for his sacred animal; while the deity was being worshipped, a dog lay at the side of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123  
124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Collocot

 

Tongan

 
natural
 

animals

 

sacred

 

totemism

 

system

 

developed

 

highly

 
tribes

households

 
nature
 
animal
 
worship
 
religion
 

Boolotoo

 

objects

 

regarded

 

Bolotoo

 

possession


private

 

disposed

 

called

 

deities

 

gradation

 

household

 

reverence

 

religious

 
divine
 

object


worshipped

 

populous

 

hierarchy

 

indications

 
development
 
support
 

Journal

 
Polynesian
 
conclusion
 

Society


polytheism
 
worshippers
 

Religion

 

generally

 

forbidden

 

information

 

period

 

concludes

 

Further

 

national