FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   >>  
il, 1829, complained direct to Whitehall that "the States had exceeded their annual revenues for works of public utility without the express sanction of the superior authority, and had for these same works contracted liabilities which exceeded the means of the States." The Privy Council on the 19th June forwarded the complaint to the States and asked for an explanation. The States, at their meeting, 27th August, 1829, instructed a Committee to examine the charges, draw up a report and answer, and submit the same to the States. The Committee selected was the Finance Committee, which was revised at this time, the chief change being the omission of the two complainants, James Carey and Jean le Marchant. A guess may be hazarded that this Committee appointed Daniel de Lisle Brock to draft the reply. This interesting document fortunately exists not only in French but in English (doubtless for the benefit of the Privy Council). In characteristic language, enthusiastic and patriotic, while clear and matter of fact, it sets out the present situation and sketches the history of the Island since the close of the War. The greater part of it appears in the next chapter. CHAPTER VI THE REPLY OF THE STATES With a few slight omissions the following is the official translation of "The Answer of the States of Guernsey to the Complaint of three of their Members dated the 10th April, and transmitted by their Lordships's Order of 19th June, 1829. "My Lords, Discarding from their minds allusions and topics of a personal nature and every sentiment of recrimination, the States of Guernsey are desirous of vindicating themselves in the manner most becoming the respect due to your Lordships, and the consciousness of right, by setting facts against errors, reason against fears, 'honest deeds against faltering words.' "To judge of the States by any particular act or period would be to dismiss all consideration of previous motives and future benefits, of connecting causes and effects. Comprehensive views of the general policy of the States can alone enable them to prove, and your Lordships to judge, of the wisdom and propriety of their measures. Taking, therefore, a retrospect of the period which immediately preceded the grant of the duty on Spirituous Liquors first graciously conceded in 1814; they deem it necessary to lay before your Lordships a summary account of the state of this Island, at, and from that period.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   >>  



Top keywords:
States
 

Lordships

 

Committee

 
period
 

Council

 

Island

 
Guernsey
 

exceeded

 

reason

 
desirous

setting

 

vindicating

 

errors

 
respect
 
recrimination
 

consciousness

 

manner

 

Members

 
Complaint
 

Answer


official

 

translation

 

transmitted

 

topics

 

personal

 

nature

 

allusions

 

honest

 

Discarding

 

sentiment


previous

 

preceded

 
immediately
 

Spirituous

 

retrospect

 
wisdom
 

propriety

 

measures

 

Taking

 

Liquors


summary

 

account

 
graciously
 

conceded

 

enable

 
dismiss
 

consideration

 
faltering
 
omissions
 
motives