had replied to Chase's "Caution," and
as this is the only direct reply to that article I have been able to find,
I have ventured to ascribe this to him. The letter is in the Madison
Papers in the Department of State, which at present are restricted from
use, so I am unable to print it here.
A Friend To The Constitution.
The Maryland Journal, (Number 977)
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 1787.
TO THE INHABITANTS OF BALTIMORE TOWN.
You have been addressed in the last Friday's paper, by a writer under the
signature of _Caution_, who would persuade you that you ought to withhold
your approbation, at this time, from the Federal Constitution recommended
by the Convention.
This writer may have the best intentions in the world towards the _public
welfare_, and the _prosperity of Baltimore_; but every one must perceive
that he is an enemy to the proposed Constitution, and wishes to prevent
you from expressing yourselves in its favour, not only _at this time_, but
at any _future time_.
Mr. C---- is said to be the author of this admonition; but that this is a
malicious insinuation, aimed at his sincerity, will appear by considering
his _recent promise_ on this subject, signed and published by himself, in
reference with the resolution of the Convention, upon which that promise
is founded. I shall state both the resolution and promise, that you may
judge for yourselves.
The resolve of the Convention declares, that the Constitution should be
submitted to a Convention of Delegates, chosen in each State by the
people, under the recommendation of its legislature, _for their assent and
ratification_.
Mr. C---- being called upon, before his election, to declare himself on this
point, promises to the people, "that he will use his endeavours, if
elected, to call a Convention."
I would just observe on this resolve and promise: First--that the resolve
makes it an _absolute condition_ that the legislature recommend a
Convention _to assent to, and ratify, the Constitution_. Secondly--that the
_promise_ made by Mr. C---- is obligatory upon him, to use his endeavors to
procure a Convention _for this purpose_.
Another remark, which occurs on this occasion, is, that Mr. C---- could not
mean that a Convention ought to be called _for any other purpose_ than to
assent to, and ratify, the Constitution; for it is absurd to suppose he
meant the Convention should be authorized by the legislature to propose
amendments or alterations,
|