FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
eping and terribly true charge, however, we must except the Grants and the--alas! how few!--Rosecranses. The report says, "but for the fog," etc. All lost battles in the world had for cause some _buts_--except the genuine _but_--in the brains of the commander. "How near we came to accomplishing," etc.--is only a repetition of what, _ad nauseam_, is recorded by history as lamentations of defeated generals. "The battle would have been far more decisive." Of course it would have been so, if--won. "As it was, we were very near success," etc. So the man who takes the chance in the lottery. He has No. 4, and No. 3 wins the prize. The apostrophe to the heroism of the soldiers is sickly and pale. The heroism of the soldiers! It is as brilliant, as pure, and as certain as the sun. The attack was planned, (see paragraph 2 of the report,) on the circumstance or supposition that the enemy extended too much his line, and thus scattered his forces. But in paragraph 4, Burnside stated that the fog, (O, fog!) etc., gave the enemy twenty-four hours' time to concentrate his forces in his strong positions--when the calculation based on the enemy's _division of forces_ failed, and the attack lost all the chances considered propitious. The whole plan had for its basis probabilities and impossibilities--schoolroom speculations--instead of being, as it ought to have been, as every plan of a battle should be, based on the chances of the _terrain_, by the position of the enemy, and other conditions, almost wholly depending upon which the armies operate. It is natural that martial Hooker objected to it. Oh! could I have blood, blood, blood, instead of ink! Constructing the bridge over the Rappahannock, our engineers were killed in scores by the sharp-shooters of the enemy. Malediction on those imbecile staffs! The _A B C_ of warfare, and of sound common sense teach, that such works are to be made either under cover of a powerful artillery fire, or, what is still better, if possible, a general sends over the river in some way, with infantry to clear its banks, and to dislodge the enemy. In such cases one engineer saved, and time won, justify the loss of almost twenty soldiers to one workman. Some one finally suggested an expedition and they did at the end what ought to have been done at the start. O West Point! thy science is marvellous! The staff treated the construction of a bridge over the Rappahannock as if it were build
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

soldiers

 
forces
 

heroism

 

chances

 

attack

 

Rappahannock

 
paragraph
 

bridge

 

battle

 

twenty


report

 

shooters

 

Malediction

 
imbecile
 
scores
 

charge

 

engineers

 

killed

 

staffs

 

common


warfare
 

treated

 
armies
 

operate

 
natural
 
depending
 

conditions

 

Grants

 

wholly

 
martial

Hooker
 
construction
 
Constructing
 
objected
 

marvellous

 

workman

 

finally

 

justify

 

terribly

 
engineer

suggested

 

expedition

 

dislodge

 
powerful
 

artillery

 

position

 

infantry

 
science
 

general

 

apostrophe