FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  
d, Wales, and Scotland. (90) In 1870 the Spanish Government enacted a law emancipating all slaves in Cuba over sixty years of age, and declaring all free who were born after the enactment. In 1886 but 25,000 slaves remained, and these were emancipated _en masse_ by a decree of the Spanish Cortes. The last vestige of slavery (the patronato system) was swept away by a royal decree dated October 7, 1886. (91) But see _Service in Spanish War_, Appendix A. XIX DRED SCOTT CASE--1857 On March 6, 1857, two days after Buchanan was inaugurated President of the United States, the famous Dred Scott case was decided. Chief-Justice Taney of Maryland, Justices Wayne of Georgia, Catron of Tennessee, Daniel of Virginia, Campbell of Alabama, Grier of Pennsylvania, and Nelson of New York concurred in the decision, though some of them only in a qualified way. Chief-Justice Taney read the opinion of the court. Justices McLean of Ohio and Curtis of Massachusetts dissented on all points. All the justices read opinions at length.(93) Chief-Justice Taney was a devout Roman Catholic, given much to letters, of great industry, and generally regarded as a great jurist. When the case was decided he was nearly eighty years of age, and he was then, in the distracted condition of the country, deeply imbued with the idea that the Supreme Court had the power to and could settle the slavery question. All the other justices were eminent jurists and men of learning. The decision reached marked an epoch in American history, and it gave slavery an apparent perpetual lease of life; this was, however, only apparent. The case was twice argued by eminent lawyers; Blair and G. F. Curtis for Dred Scott, and by Geyer and Johnson for the defendant. Dred Scott brought a suit in the United States Circuit Court in Missouri for trespass against one Sanford, charging him with assault on him, his wife, and two children--in fact, for his and their freedom. The facts, as agreed, were as follows: "In the year 1834, the plaintiff (Dred Scott) was a negro slave belonging to Dr. Emerson, who was a surgeon in the army of the United States. In that year, 1834, said Dr. Emerson took the plaintiff from the State of Missouri to the military post at Rock Island, in the State of Illinois, and held him there as a slave until the month of April or May, 1836. At the time last mentioned, said Dr. Emerson removed the plaintiff from said military po
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115  
116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Emerson

 

States

 
United
 
Justice
 

plaintiff

 

slavery

 
Spanish
 

Curtis

 

eminent

 
justices

decided
 

Missouri

 

decision

 

slaves

 

military

 

decree

 

Justices

 

apparent

 

imbued

 

perpetual


distracted

 
condition
 
deeply
 

country

 

learning

 
question
 

Supreme

 

settle

 

jurists

 
American

history
 
marked
 

reached

 
trespass
 

Island

 

Illinois

 
belonging
 

surgeon

 

mentioned

 

removed


agreed

 

defendant

 
brought
 

Circuit

 

Johnson

 

lawyers

 

freedom

 
children
 

Sanford

 

charging