FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160  
161   162   163   164   >>  
solemn festival in memory of a _dead_ lamb--the Passover lamb that was put to death for them, but never came to life again. We keep our Christian sacrament in memory of the Lamb of God, who died for us indeed, but who rose from the dead, and is alive forevermore. As we keep this solemn festival, we may lift up our adoring hearts to him and say for ourselves personally, "O, the Lamb! the loving Lamb! The Lamb of Calvary! The Lamb that was slain, but liveth again, And intercedes for me!" And though they are both memorial services, yet this one thought makes a world-wide difference between them. The bread and meat which the pious Jew ate, when he kept the Passover, and the wine which he drank on that occasion, would strengthen his body, but there was nothing connected with those material substances that would do any special good to his soul. It is different, however, with our Christian festival of the Lord's Supper. And this difference is clearly brought out in what we find in the catechism of our church on this subject. In speaking of this holy sacrament, the question is asked--"What are the benefits whereof we are partakers thereby?" And the answer to this question is--"The strengthening and refreshing of our souls, by the body and blood of Christ, as our bodies are by the bread and wine." Here we see that while the Lord's Supper is a memorial service indeed, it is at the same time something more than that. _And then, the actual bodily presence of Christ with them must have compelled the apostles to understand the words he used on that occasion, in this memorial sense_. They could not possibly have considered him as meaning that the bread and wine which he gave them at that solemn service did, in any mysterious and supernatural way, become his actual flesh and blood; because, these were already before them in the form of his own body. And they could not be in his body and in the bread and wine, at the same time. The sense in which Jesus first used these words--"my body" and "my blood," was clearly the memorial sense. He meant his disciples to understand him as saying "Take this bread in remembrance of my body, which is to be crucified for you;" and "Take this wine in remembrance of my blood which is to be shed for you." This was what he taught the apostles when he first used these words among them; and this was all he taught them; and we have no right to use these words in any other sense till
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160  
161   162   163   164   >>  



Top keywords:

memorial

 

festival

 
solemn
 

understand

 

Supper

 

memory

 

sacrament

 

actual

 

Christian

 

Passover


difference

 
question
 
taught
 

Christ

 
apostles
 
occasion
 

remembrance

 

service

 

compelled

 

bodies


refreshing

 

bodily

 

presence

 

meaning

 

crucified

 

disciples

 

mysterious

 

strengthening

 

possibly

 
considered

supernatural

 

services

 
intercedes
 

thought

 

liveth

 
adoring
 

hearts

 
loving
 

Calvary

 
personally

catechism

 

church

 

subject

 
brought
 

speaking

 

whereof

 
partakers
 

benefits

 

forevermore

 
connected