FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  
conduct and motives of Sir William Berkeley, the causes of the Rebellion stand out with great clearness:--England's selfish commercial policy, the Culpeper-Arlington grant, the Dutch wars, storms and pestilence, inefficient if not corrupt government, excessive taxes. The only wonder is that the insurrection did not occur earlier. In fact two mutinies did break out in 1674, when the excessively heavy taxes of that year were announced, but the rebels lacked leaders and were suppressed without great difficulty.[469] As early as 1673 the defection of the planters was so great that it was feared many might attempt to deliver the colony into the hands of the Dutch. Berkeley wrote that a large part of the people were so desperately poor that they might reasonably be expected upon any small advantage of the enemy to "revolt to them in hopes of bettering their Condition by Shareing the Plunder of the Country with them".[470] A certain John Knight reported "that the planters there doe generally desire a trade with the Dutch and all other nations and would not be singly bound to the trade of England, and speake openly there that they are in the nature of slaves, soe that the hearts of the greatest part of them are taken away from his Majesty".[471] Thus the downtrodden planters, alienated from England, angered at the Governor, even distrusting their own Assembly, waited but an occasion and a leader to rise in open rebellion. A new Indian war offered the occasion, and they found their leader in young Nathaniel Bacon. FOOTNOTES: [381] P. R. O., CO1-34-95. [382] Scobell, Vol. II, p. 132. [383] Bruce, Ec. Hist., Vol. I, p. 357. [384] Governor Berkeley wrote in 1666 that the King's customs from the Virginia and Maryland tobacco would amount "unto about L100,000". [385] Bruce, Ec. Hist., Vol. I, p. 354. [386] P. R. O., CO1-21. [387] P. R. O., CO1-21. [388] P. R. O., CO1-30-51. Compare Petition of Governor Berkeley, Aug. 22, 1662, CO1-16. [389] Hen., Vol. II, pp. 120, 121. [390] P. R. O., CO1-19; Hen., Vol. II, p. 272. [391] Hen., Vol. II, p. 238. [392] Ibid. [393] Hen., Vol. II, p. 123. [394] P. R. O., CO1-19; Hen., Vol. II, p. 178. [395] P. R. O., CO1-16; Hen., Vol. II, p. 17. [396] P. R. O., CO1-26-77; Hen., Vol. II, p. 315. [397] P. R. O., CO1-24. [398] P. R, O., CO1-30; Bruce, Ec. Hist., Vol. I, p. 357. [399] P. R. O., CO5-1371-328; Va. Mag., Vol. III, p. 38. [400] Bruce, Ec. Hist.,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Berkeley

 

Governor

 
England
 

planters

 

leader

 

occasion

 
alienated
 
downtrodden
 

angered

 
Assembly

distrusting

 
waited
 

Scobell

 

offered

 

FOOTNOTES

 

Nathaniel

 

Indian

 
rebellion
 

amount

 
tobacco

customs

 

Virginia

 

Maryland

 

Compare

 

Petition

 

excessively

 

mutinies

 

insurrection

 

earlier

 
announced

difficulty
 

rebels

 

lacked

 

leaders

 

suppressed

 
clearness
 

selfish

 

commercial

 
policy
 
Rebellion

conduct

 

motives

 

William

 

Culpeper

 

Arlington

 

government

 

corrupt

 

excessive

 

inefficient

 

storms