FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   >>  
, has turned out a gross delusion. Every misrepresentation on this head was met by overwhelming facts; and the consequence is, that the Premier did not venture, in his first speech, to found upon a scarcity as a reason for proposing his measure. Something, indeed, was said about the possibility of a pressure occurring before the arrival of the next harvest--it was perhaps necessary to say so; but no man who has studied the agricultural statistics of last harvest, can give the slightest weight to that assertion. His second speech has just been put into our hands. Here certainly he is more explicit. With deep gravity, and a tone of the greatest deliberation, he tells the House of Commons, that before the month of May shall arrive, the pressure will be upon us. We read that announcement, so confidently uttered, with no slight amount of misgiving as to the opinions we have already chronicled, but the next half column put us right. There is, after all, no considerable deficiency in the grain crop. It may be that the country has raised that amount of corn which is necessary for its ordinary consumption, but the potato crop in Ireland has failed! This, then--the failure of the potato crop in Ireland--is the immediate cause, the necessity, of abolishing the protections to agriculture in Great Britain! Was there ever such logic? What has the murrain in potatoes to do with the question of foreign competition, as applied to English, Scottish, nay, Irish corn? We are old enough to recollect something like a famine in the Highlands, when the poor were driven to such shifts as humanity shudders to recall; but we never heard that distress attributed to the fact of English protection. If millions of the Irish will not work, and will not grow corn--if they prefer trusting to the potato, and the potato happens to fail--are _we_ to be punished for that defect, be it one of carelessness, of improvidence, or of misgovernment? Better that we had no reason at all than one so obviously flimsy. If we turn to the petitions which, about the end of autumn, were forwarded from different towns, praying for that favourite measure of the League, the opening of the ports, it will be seen that one and all of them were founded on the assumed fact, that the grain crop was a deficient one. That has proved to be fallacy, and is of course no longer tenable; but now we are asked to take, as a supplementary argument, the state of the potatoes in Ireland, and to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   >>  



Top keywords:

potato

 

Ireland

 
English
 

harvest

 
amount
 

pressure

 

reason

 
measure
 

speech

 

potatoes


driven

 

recall

 

shudders

 
shifts
 

humanity

 

distress

 
protection
 

Britain

 

millions

 

attributed


Highlands
 

Scottish

 
applied
 
murrain
 

foreign

 
competition
 

famine

 

question

 

recollect

 

founded


assumed

 

opening

 

League

 
praying
 

favourite

 

deficient

 

supplementary

 

argument

 

tenable

 

proved


fallacy

 

longer

 
forwarded
 

defect

 

punished

 

turned

 

carelessness

 

improvidence

 

prefer

 
trusting