FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161  
>>  
ll others because of a feeling at higher levels that certain recommendations could be better evaluated in terms of a final report's whole set of proposals. In the present set of recommendations they are repeated, for they represent genuine needs. Some have been slightly altered in the light of evolving restrictive reality, more recent knowledge, or flexibility, and the suggested or implied Interim scheduling for some has been changed. It is no longer envisioned, for instance, that the parkway extension below Mount Vernon will be authorized and constructed quickly. The present recommendations, though much wider in overall scope than our earlier ones, represent only a first step in planning for the Basin, for reasons presented in full in this report. They are attuned to present economic and technological possibilities, as they must be. We believe that if they get full and calm appraisal they will prove to be acceptable politically, for all of them that call for major projects represent solutions for acute and imminent problems for which other satisfactory solutions do not presently exist, and to the greatest possible degree they have been made flexible to accommodate possible future change in aims or techniques. In most cases, the reasons for specific recommendations have already been given in the body of this report. However, the primary public interest that focuses on the matter of major storage reservoirs may make it worthwhile at this point to review and enlarge upon the facts. Some reservoirs are going to have to be built if the Basin is to cope satisfactorily with water supply, water quality, and recreational demands. At the time of the _Interim Report_, we recognized that the three reservoirs in the Paw Paw Bends area, together with Bloomington, were very possibly not going to be enough to meet the need, but we made a recommendation for their authorization because it was clear that they would take the edge off the immediately looming water problem at Washington, would mesh well with any additional future storage in the Basin, and would have no major disruptive scenic effects but instead would provide a great deal of high-quality flat-water recreation in an area where there was significant demand for it. These considerations still apply. However, the more complete picture of Basin water problems that has emerged in our studies since the _Interim Report_ shows that at least two more reservoirs are very possibly
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161  
>>  



Top keywords:

reservoirs

 

recommendations

 

Interim

 

represent

 

present

 

report

 

quality

 
Report
 

However

 

solutions


problems
 

possibly

 

reasons

 

future

 
storage
 
recreational
 

recognized

 

demands

 

interest

 

focuses


matter

 

public

 

primary

 

satisfactorily

 
worthwhile
 

review

 

enlarge

 
supply
 

significant

 

demand


recreation

 

provide

 

considerations

 

studies

 

emerged

 

complete

 

picture

 

effects

 
recommendation
 

authorization


specific

 

Bloomington

 

additional

 

disruptive

 

scenic

 

immediately

 

looming

 

problem

 
Washington
 

changed