FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   >>   >|  
y followers on the 4th of November. His forces will gradually go to one side or the other. It is only when some great principle is at stake that thousands of men are willing to vote with a known minority. _Question_. But what about the Prohibitionists? _Answer_. They have a very large following. They are fighting for something they believe to be of almost infinite consequence, and I can readily understand how a Prohibitionist is willing to be in the minority. It may be well enough for me to say here, that my course politically is not determined by my likes or dislikes of individuals. I want to be governed by principles, not persons. If I really thought that in this campaign a real principle was at stake, I should take part. The only great question now is protection, and I am satisfied that it is in no possible danger. _Question_. Not even in the case of a Democratic victory? _Answer_. Not even in the event of a Democratic victory. No State in the Union is for free trade. Every free trader has an exception. These exceptions combined, control the tariff legislation of this country, and if the Democrats were in power to-day, with the control of the House and Senate and Executive, the exceptions would combine and protect protection. As long as the Federal Government collects taxes or revenue on imports, just so long these revenues will be arranged to protect home manufactures. _Question_. You said that if there were a great principle at stake, you would take part in the campaign. You think, then, that there is no great principle involved? _Answer_. If it were a matter of personal liberty, I should take part. If the Republican party had stood by the Civil Rights Bill, I should have taken part in the present campaign. _Question_. Still, I suppose we can count on you as a Republican? _Answer_. Certainly, I am a Republican. --_Evening Post_, San Francisco, California, September 16, 1884. INGERSOLL CATECHISED. _Question_. Does Christianity advance or retard civilization? _Answer_. If by Christianity you mean the orthodox church, then I unhesitatingly answer that it does retard civilization, always has retarded it, and always will. I can imagine no man who can be benefitted by being made a Catholic or a Presbyterian or a Baptist or a Methodist--or, in other words, by being made an orthodox Christian. But by Christianity I do not mean morality, kindness, forgiveness, justice. Th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Question

 

Answer

 
principle
 

Republican

 

Christianity

 
campaign
 

protection

 
civilization
 
retard
 

orthodox


exceptions
 

control

 

protect

 

Democratic

 

victory

 

minority

 

Rights

 

Certainly

 

Evening

 
suppose

present
 

personal

 

revenues

 
arranged
 
revenue
 

imports

 

manufactures

 
matter
 

liberty

 

involved


Francisco
 

Catholic

 

Presbyterian

 
followers
 

benefitted

 

imagine

 

Baptist

 

Methodist

 

forgiveness

 
justice

kindness

 
morality
 

Christian

 
retarded
 
INGERSOLL
 

CATECHISED

 
California
 

September

 

advance

 
unhesitatingly