FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   >>  
name of this deity is composed of two Maya words, _ek_, "black," and _chu_, "calabash," and hence signifies "the black calabash," and the form and coloring of the symbol are apparently intended to denote this signification. If this interpretation be correct it is phonetic, as there is nothing in or pertaining to the figure of the deity which corresponds with it, except the color. If the interpretation given of the preceding symbols Nos. 22, 24, 26, 27_a_, and 33 be correct, there can be scarcely a doubt that they are phonetic. In the first--_cacau_, _cacauak_, or _cacauche_, the "cacao"--we see Landa's letter _Ca_, which is doubled in each of the three forms taken from the different codices. In the twenty-sixth--_Kukuitz_, the Quetzal--Landa's _Ku_ is duplicated, as it should be if phonetic, while in 27_a_, _Kuch_, it appears but once. There is here also an additional evidence of phoneticism in the fact that, while one of the symbols used to denote this bird shows simply its head, and is surely not phonetic, the other is entirely different and bears no resemblance whatever to any feature or characteristic of the bird. Moreover, both parts of it are used in other combinations referring to entirely different things. If my interpretation of No. 14 (_Xamach_ or _Chimix_) be right, it is probably phonetic also. It is composed, as will be seen by reference to the figure, of two symbols closely resembling that for the day Ymix, except that the top portion of one is omitted. The resemblance in sound to a duplication of Ymix is apparent. The slight but permanent variation of the right hand portion from the usual Ymix symbol and the omission of the top portion of the left hand one are scarcely explainable on the supposition that they form simply a conventional sign; but if phonetic the reason is apparent, as the _m_ sound is not repeated in the Maya name. This conclusion is strengthened by the fact that the month _Mac_, found in the last or bottom line of Plate 49, is precisely the same as the right portion of No. 14, with Landa's symbol for _Ca_ added. This probably justifies us in concluding that the true name of this month is _Camach_, "the jaw" or "jaws," and that Landa's figure is simply a rude representation of the lips or mouth. I have expressed the opinion[370-1] that the chief phonetic element of No. 8 (the stone symbol), if used to represent sound, is _p_ or _pp_. This opinion seems to be confirmed by the fact that
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   >>  



Top keywords:

phonetic

 

symbol

 

portion

 

symbols

 

figure

 

simply

 

interpretation

 
apparent
 

resemblance

 

calabash


composed
 

scarcely

 

correct

 

denote

 
opinion
 
conventional
 

explainable

 

supposition

 

reference

 

duplication


reason

 

omitted

 

resembling

 

slight

 
variation
 

permanent

 

closely

 
omission
 

expressed

 

representation


confirmed

 

represent

 

element

 

bottom

 

repeated

 

conclusion

 

strengthened

 

concluding

 
Camach
 

justifies


precisely

 

characteristic

 

apparently

 

coloring

 

letter

 

cacauche

 

doubled

 

twenty

 
Kukuitz
 

codices