n,
Pas meme Academicien;'

what do you mean by asserting the contrary?" Being devoid of the
blessings of an Academy in England, we are unaccustomed to see our
ablest men treated in this fashion even by a "Perpetual Secretary."

Or again, considering that if there is any one quality of Mr. Darwin's
work to which friends and foes have alike borne witness, it is his
candour and fairness in admitting and discussing objections, what is to
be thought of M. Flourens' assertion, that

"M. Darwin ne cite que les auteurs qui partagent ses opinions." (P.
40.)

Once more (p. 65):

"Enfin l'ouvrage de M. Darwin a paru. On ne peut qu'etre frappe du
talent de l'auteur. Mais que d'idees obscures, que d'idees fausses!
Quel jargon metaphysique jete mal a propos dans l'histoire
naturelle, qui tombe dans le galimatias des qu'elle sort des idees
claires, des idees justes! Quel langage pretentieux et vide!
Quelles personifications pueriles et surannees! O lucidite! O
solidite de l'esprit Francais, que devenez-vous?"

"Obscure ideas," "metaphysical jargon," "pretentious and empty
language," "puerile and superannuated personifications." Mr. Darwin has
many and hot opponents on this side of the Channel and in Germany, but
we do not recollect to have found precisely these sins in the long
catalogue of those hitherto laid to his charge. It is worth while,
therefore, to examine into these discoveries effected solely by the aid
of the "lucidity and solidity" of the mind of M. Flourens.

According to M. Flourens, Mr. Darwin's great error is that he has
personified Nature (p. 10), and further that he has

"imagined a natural selection: he imagines afterwards that this
power of selecting (_pouvoir d'elire_) which he gives to Nature is
similar to the power of man. These two suppositions admitted,
nothing stops him: he plays with Nature as he likes, and makes her
do all he pleases." (P. 6.)

And this is the way M. Flourens extinguishes natural selection:

"Voyons donc encore une fois, ce qu'il peut y avoir de fonde dans
ce qu'on nomme _election naturelle_.

"_L'election naturelle_ n'est sous un autre nom que la nature. Pour
un etre organise, la nature n'est que l'organisation, ni plus ni
moins.

"Il faudra donc aussi personnifier _l'organisation_, et dire que
_l'organisation_ choisit _l'organisation_. _L'election naturelle_