rsache ihrer Bewegungen, kurz der Ursprung der ganzen gegenwaertigen
Verfassung des Weltbaues werden koennen eingesehen werden, ehe die
Erzeugung eines einzigen Krautes oder einer Raupe aus mechanischen
Gruenden, deutlich und vollstaendig kund werden wird."--KANT'S _Saemmtliche
Werke_, Bd. I. p. 220.
[49] Grant ("History of Physical Astronomy," p. 574) makes but the
briefest reference to Kant.
[50] "Allgemeine Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels; oder Versuch
von der Verfassung und dem mechanischen Ursprunge des ganzen
Weltgebaeudes nach Newton'schen Grundsatzen abgehandelt."--KANT'S
_Saemmtliche Werke_, Bd. i. p. 207.
[51] Systeme du Monde, tome ii. chap. 6
[52] Kant's "Saemmtliche Werke," Bd. viii. p. 145.
[53] Sir William Thomson implies (loc. cit. p. 16), that the precise
time is of no consequence: "the principle is the same;" but, as the
principle is admitted, the whole discussion turns on its practical
results.
[54] "Untersuchung der Frage ob die Erde in ihrer Umdrehung um die
Achse, wodurch sie die Abwechselung des Tages und der Nacht
hervorbringt, einige Veraenderung seit den ersten Zeiten ihres Ursprunges
erlitten habe, &c."--KANT'S _Saemmtliche Werke_, Bd. i. p. 178.
[55] Sir W. Thomson, loc. cit., p. 14.
[56] Loc. cit., p. 27
[57] Ibid.
[58] It will be understood that I do not wish to deny that the earth's
rotation _may be_ undergoing retardation.
[59] Loc. cit., p. 20.
[60] Loc. cit., p. 24.
XII.
THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES.
Mr. Darwin's long-standing and well-earned scientific eminence probably
renders him indifferent to that social notoriety which passes by the
name of success; but if the calm spirit of the philosopher have not yet
wholly superseded the ambition and the vanity of the carnal man within
him, he must be well satisfied with the results of his venture in
publishing the "Origin of Species." Overflowing the narrow bounds of
purely scientific circles, the "species question" divides with Italy and
the Volunteers the attention of general society. Everybody has read Mr.
Darwin's book, or, at least, has given an opinion upon its merits or
demerits; pietists, whether lay or ecclesiastic, decry it with the mild
railing which sounds so charitable; bigots denounce it with ignorant
invective; old ladies, of both sexes, consider it a decidedly dangerous
book, and even savans, who have no better mud to throw, quote antiquated
writers to show that its author is no bet
|