FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315  
316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   >>   >|  
The six last lines are the best, but not excellent. The rest of his sepulchral performances hardly deserve the notice of criticism. The contemptible Dialogue between He and She should have been suppressed for the author's sake. In his last epitaph on himself, in which he attempts to be jocular upon one of the few things that make wise men serious, he confounds the living man with the dead: Under this stone, or under this sill, Or under this turf, &c. When a man is once buried, the question, under what he is buried, is easily decided. He forgot that though he wrote the epitaph in a state of uncertainty, yet it could not be laid over him till his grave was made. Such is the folly of wit when it is ill employed. The world has but little new; even this wretchedness seems to have been borrowed from the following tuneless lines: Ludovici Areosti humantur ossa Sub hoc marmore, vel sub hac humo, seu Sub quicquid voluit benignus haeres, Sive haerede benignior comes, seu Opportunius incidens viator; Nam scire haud potuit futura, sed nec Tanti erat vacuum sibi cadaver Ut urnam cuperet parare vivens; Vivens ista tamen sibi paravit, Quae inscribi voluit suo sepulchro Olim siquod haberet is sepulchrum. Surely Ariosto did not venture to expect that his trifle would have ever had such an illustrious imitator. ----- [Footnote 108: This weakness was so great that he constantly wore stays, as I have been assured by a waterman at Twickenham, who, in lifting him into his boat, had often felt them. His method of taking the air on the water was to have a sedan chair in the boat, in which he sat with the glasses down. H.] [Footnote 109: This opinion is warmly controverted by Roscoe, in his Life of Pope; and, perhaps, with justice; for, to adopt the words of D'Israeli, "Pope's literary warfare was really the wars of his poetical ambition more, perhaps, than of the petulance and strong irritability of his temper." See also sir Walter Scott's Swift, i. 316. ED.] [Footnote 110: This is incorrect; his ordinary hand was certainly neat and elegant. I have some of it now before me. M.] [Footnote 111: Pope's first instructor is repeatedly mentioned by Spence under the name of Banister, and described as the family priest. Spence's Anecd. 259. 283. Singer's edit. Roscoe's Pope, i. 11. ED.] [Footnote 112: Dryden died May 1, 1700, a year earlier than Johnson supposed. M
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315  
316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Spence

 
voluit
 

Roscoe

 
buried
 

epitaph

 

method

 
taking
 

sepulchrum

 

controverted


opinion

 

Surely

 

warmly

 
glasses
 

Ariosto

 

assured

 
waterman
 

Twickenham

 

weakness

 

constantly


lifting
 

trifle

 
expect
 
imitator
 

illustrious

 
venture
 

temper

 

Banister

 

family

 

priest


mentioned

 

repeatedly

 

instructor

 
earlier
 

supposed

 

Johnson

 

Singer

 

Dryden

 

elegant

 

poetical


ambition

 

strong

 
petulance
 

warfare

 

Israeli

 

literary

 

irritability

 

haberet

 

incorrect

 
ordinary