FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  
make the _B_-board entirely separate from the _A_-board, although the general characteristics of construction remain the same. The reason for separate _A_- and _B_-switchboards in large exchanges is to provide for independent growth of each without the growth of either interfering with the other. A portion of an incoming trunk, or _B_-board, is shown in Fig. 378. The multiple is as usual, and, of course, there are no outgoing trunk jacks nor regular cord pairs. Instead the key and plug shelves are provided with the incoming-trunk plug equipments, thirty of these being about the usual quota assigned to each operator's position. In multi-office exchanges, employing many central offices, such, for instance, as those in New York or Chicago, it is frequently found that nearly all of the calls that originate in one office are for subscribers whose lines terminate in some other office. In other words, the number of calls that have to be trunked to other offices is greatly in excess of the number of calls that may be handled through the multiple of the _A_-board in which they originate. It is not infrequent to have the percentage of trunked calls run as high as 75 per cent of the total number of calls originating in any one office, and in some of the offices in the larger cities this percentage runs higher than 90 per cent. [Illustration: Fig. 378. Section of Trunk Switchboard] [Illustration: Fig. 379. Section of Partial Multiple Switchboard] This fact has brought up for consideration the problem as to whether, when the nature of the traffic is such that only a very small portion of the calls can be handled in the office where they originate, it is worth while to employ the multiple terminals for the subscribers' lines on the _A_-boards. In other words, if so great a proportion as 90 per cent of the calls have to be trunked any way, is it worth while to provide the great expense of a full multiple on all the sections of the _A_-board in order to make it possible to handle the remaining 10 per cent of the calls directly by the _A_-operators? As a result of this consideration it has been generally conceded that where such a very great percentage of trunking was necessary, the full multiple of the subscribers' lines on each section was not warranted, and what is known as the partial multiple board has come into existence in large manual exchanges. In these the regular subscribers' multiple is entirely omitted from the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

multiple

 

office

 

subscribers

 
number
 
trunked
 

originate

 

percentage

 

offices

 
exchanges
 

growth


handled
 

consideration

 

separate

 

provide

 

Illustration

 

Section

 

incoming

 

portion

 
Switchboard
 

regular


problem

 

Multiple

 

brought

 

traffic

 

nature

 

Partial

 

trunking

 

section

 

conceded

 

generally


result

 

warranted

 
existence
 

manual

 

omitted

 

partial

 

operators

 
proportion
 
expense
 

terminals


boards

 
sections
 

directly

 

remaining

 
handle
 
employ
 

assigned

 

operator

 

equipments

 

thirty