FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167  
168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   >>  
hows what ingenuity these religious men had at their command, and what trouble they would take to avoid having to face a fact and reform a bad system. There follows a long and rather difficult argument to show that the world is, in itself, eternal. The former discussion on this point had only shown that the gods would not destroy it. This shows that its own nature is indestructible. The arguments are very inconclusive, though clever, and one wonders why the author is at so much pains. Indeed, he is so earnest that at the end of the chapter he finds it necessary to apologize to the Kosmos in case his language should have been indiscreet. The reason, I think, is that the Christians were still, as in apostolic times, pinning their faith to the approaching end of the world by fire.[190:1] They announced the end of the world as near, and they rejoiced in the prospect of its destruction. History has shown more than once what terrible results can be produced by such beliefs as these in the minds of excitable and suffering populations, especially those of eastern blood. It was widely believed that Christian fanatics had from time to time actually tried to light fires which should consume the accursed world and thus hasten the coming of the kingdom which should bring such incalculable rewards to their own organization and plunge the rest of mankind in everlasting torment. To any respectable Pagan such action was an insane crime made worse by a diabolical motive. The destruction of the world, therefore, seems to have become a subject of profound irritation, if not actually of terror. At any rate the doctrine lay at the very heart of the _perniciosa superstitio_, and Sallustius uses his best dialectic against it. The title of Chapter XVIII has a somewhat pathetic ring: 'Why are _Atheiai_'--Atheisms or rejections of God--'permitted, and that God is not injured thereby?' +Theos ou blaptetai.+ 'If over certain parts of the world there have occurred (and will occur more hereafter) rejections of the gods, a wise man need not be disturbed at that.' We have always known that the human soul was prone to error. God's providence is there; but we cannot expect all men at all times and places to enjoy it equally. In the human body it is only the eye that sees the light, the rest of the body is ignorant of the light. So are many parts of the earth ignorant of God. Very likely, also, this rejection of God is a punishment. Persons who in a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167  
168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   >>  



Top keywords:

rejections

 
destruction
 

ignorant

 

everlasting

 

perniciosa

 

mankind

 
torment
 
plunge
 

insane

 
organization

dialectic

 

superstitio

 

Sallustius

 

subject

 

profound

 

Chapter

 

diabolical

 

motive

 
irritation
 

Persons


terror

 

action

 

respectable

 

doctrine

 
permitted
 

providence

 
disturbed
 

places

 

equally

 
expect

Atheisms

 

injured

 

Atheiai

 

pathetic

 

punishment

 

occurred

 
rewards
 

blaptetai

 

rejection

 

inconclusive


clever

 

wonders

 

arguments

 

indestructible

 
destroy
 
nature
 

author

 

apologize

 
Kosmos
 

language