FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319  
320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   >>   >|  
not stay in the church during the mass, when were they? It appears certain that the nuns and the young monk spoken of by St. Gregory died in their sins, and without having received absolution from them. St. Benedict, probably, was not a priest, and had not absolved them as regards their guilt. It may be said that the excommunication spoken of by St. Gregory was not major, and in that case the holy abbot could absolve them; but would this minor and regular excommunication deserve that they should quit the church in so miraculous and public a manner? The persons excommunicated by St. Gothard, and the gentleman mentioned at the Council of Limoges, in 1031, had died unrepentant, and under sentence of excommunication; consequently in mortal sin; and yet they are granted peace and absolution after their death, at the simple entreaty of their friends. The young solitary spoken of in the _acta sanctorum_ of the Greeks, who after having quitted his cell through incontinency and disobedience, had incurred excommunication, could he receive the crown of martyrdom in that state? And if he had received it, was he not at the same time reconciled to the church? Did he not wash away his fault with his blood? And if his excommunication was only regular and minor, would he deserve after his martyrdom to be excluded from the presence of the holy mysteries? I see no other way of explaining these facts, if they are as they are related, than by saying that the story has not preserved the circumstances which might have deserved the absolution of these persons, and we must presume that the saints--above all, the bishops who absolved them--knew the rules of the church, and did nothing in the matter but what was right and conformable to the canons. But it results from all that we have just said, that as the bodies of the wicked withdraw from the company of the holy through a principle of veneration and a feeling of their own unworthiness, so also the bodies of the holy separate themselves from the wicked, from opposite motives, that they may not appear to have any connection with them, even after death, or to approve of their bad life. In short, if what is just related be true, the righteous and the saints feel deference for one another, and honor each other ever in the other world; which is probable enough. We are about to see some instances which seem to render equivocal and uncertain, as a proof of sanctity, the uncorrupted state
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319  
320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

excommunication

 

church

 
absolution
 

spoken

 

bodies

 
regular
 
deserve
 
wicked
 

saints

 

related


martyrdom
 

persons

 

received

 
Gregory
 
absolved
 
bishops
 
righteous
 

matter

 

instances

 
sanctity

circumstances

 

uncorrupted

 

preserved

 

uncertain

 

equivocal

 
presume
 

deserved

 

render

 

conformable

 

canons


motives

 

opposite

 
separate
 

connection

 

approve

 

unworthiness

 

deference

 
results
 

probable

 

withdraw


feeling

 

veneration

 

company

 

principle

 

public

 
manner
 
excommunicated
 

miraculous

 

absolve

 

Gothard