FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
the demands of his art--without deference to patrons or prejudice to party. Beyond this, whether the "policy of Mr. Whistler and his following" be "selfish or no," matters but little; but if the policy of your correspondent's "following" find itself among the ruthlessly rejected, his letter is more readily explained. [Illustration] _Talent in a Napkin_ [Sidenote: Lecture before the Church Congress, Oct. 7, 1885.] If those who talk and write so glibly as to the desirability of artists devoting themselves to the representation of the naked human form, only knew a tithe of the degradation enacted before the model is sufficiently hardened to her shameful calling, they would for ever hold their tongues and pens in supporting the practice. Is not clothedness a distinct type and feature of our Christian faith? All art representations of nakedness are out of harmony with it. J. C. HORSLEY, R.A. _The Critic "Catching on"_ [Sidenote: _Pall Mall Gaz._ Dec. 8, 1885.] Mr. Whistler is again, in a sense, the mainstay of the Society (British Artists), partly through his own individuality and partly through the innovations he has introduced.... He has several oil and pastel pictures, very slight in themselves, of the female nude, dignified and graceful in line and charmingly chaste, entitled "Harmony," "Caprice," and "Note." Beneath the latter Mr. Whistler has written, "Horsley _soit qui mal y pense_." [Sidenote: _REFLECTION:_ Meant "friendly."] "This is not," said the artist, "what people are sure to call it, 'Whistler's little joke.' On the contrary, it is an indignant protest against the idea that there is any immorality in the nude." _Ingratitude_ [Sidenote: _Pall Mall Gazette_, Dec. 10, 1885.] No, kind sir--_trop de zele_ on the part of your representative--for I surely never explain, and Art certainly requires no "indignant protest" against the unseemliness of senility. "Horsley _soit qui mal y pense_" is meanwhile a sweet sentiment--why more--and why "morality"? [Illustration] _The Complacent One_ [Sidenote: _Magazine of Art_, Dec. 1887.] Mr. Whistler has issued a brown-paper portfolio of half a dozen "Notes," reproduced in marvellous facsimile. These "Notes" are delightful sketches in Indian ink and crayon, masterly so
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Whistler

 
Sidenote
 
protest
 

indignant

 
Horsley
 
Illustration
 
policy
 

partly

 

REFLECTION

 

friendly


people
 

introduced

 

artist

 

slight

 
chaste
 
entitled
 

Harmony

 

dignified

 

charmingly

 
graceful

Caprice
 

pictures

 

written

 

female

 
Beneath
 

pastel

 

issued

 
portfolio
 

Magazine

 
sentiment

morality
 

Complacent

 

Indian

 

crayon

 

masterly

 
sketches
 

delightful

 

reproduced

 

marvellous

 
facsimile

senility

 

Gazette

 

Ingratitude

 

immorality

 
explain
 

requires

 

unseemliness

 
surely
 

representative

 

contrary