FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34  
35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   >>   >|  
would be about 52 inches. This allows sufficient work to be put on the couplings, as well as the shaft. To make solid crank shafts of this material, say of 19 inches diameter, the ingot would weigh 42 tons, the forging, when completed, 17 tons, and the finished shaft 113/4 tons; so that you see there is 25 tons wasted before any machining is done, and 51/4 tons between the forging and finished shaft. This makes it very expensive for solid shafts of large size, and it is found better to make what is termed a _built shaft_; the cranks are a little heavier, and engine framings necessarily a little wider, a matter comparatively of little moment. I give you a rough drawing of the hydraulic hammer, or strictly speaking a _press_, used by Messrs. Vickers in forging down the ingots in shafts, guns, or other large work. This hammer can give a squeeze of 3,000 tons. The steel seems to yield under it like tough putty, and, unlike the steam hammer, there is no _jarring_ on the material, and it is manipulated with the same ease as a small hammer by hydraulics. The tensile strength of steel used for shafts having increased from 24 to 30 tons, and in some cases 31 tons, considering that this was 2 tons above that specified, and that we were approaching what may be termed _hard steel_, I proposed to the makers to test this material beyond the usual tests, viz., tensile, extension, and cold bending test. The latter, I considered, was much too easy for this fine material, as a piece of fair iron will bend cold to a radius of 11/2 times its diameter or thickness, without fracture; and I proposed a test more resembling the fatigue that a crank shaft has sometimes to stand, and more worthy of this material; and in the event of its standing this successfully, I would pass the material of 30 or 31 tons tensile strength. Specimens of steel used in the shafts were cut off different parts--crank pins and main bearings--(the shafts being built shafts) and roughly planed to 11/2 inches square, and about 12 inches long. They were laid on the block as shown, and a cast iron block, fitted with a hammer head 1/2 ton weight, let suddenly fall 12 inches, the block striking the bar with a blow of about 4 tons. The steel bar was then turned upside down, and the blow repeated, reversing the piece every time until fracture was observed, and the bar ultimately broken. The results were that this steel stood 58 blows before showing signs of fracture, and wa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34  
35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

shafts

 

material

 

hammer

 

inches

 
forging
 

tensile

 

fracture

 

termed

 

diameter

 

proposed


strength
 

finished

 
fatigue
 
worthy
 

extension

 

thickness

 
radius
 

standing

 
bending
 
considered

resembling

 

repeated

 

reversing

 

upside

 
turned
 
suddenly
 

striking

 

observed

 

showing

 

ultimately


broken

 
results
 

weight

 

bearings

 

Specimens

 
roughly
 

planed

 

fitted

 
square
 

successfully


expensive

 

machining

 

cranks

 
matter
 

comparatively

 

moment

 

necessarily

 

framings

 

heavier

 

engine