FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  
I said, coldly, 'I was invited to meet the _prefect of the police_. I wish to know what is deemed an outrage to the established government of France?' "The reply, was, 'The procureur-general noticed several portions of your book; sit down and we will read them!' "I listened to several extracts, where there were allusions to _princes_, (Louis Napoleon had been formerly a prince, and this was objected to,) and remarked to them that France recognized _no princes_--that what I had written about the expedition to Italy, I had the right, as a publicist, to write. The world had universally repudiated that expedition, and the president had tacitly done the same in his letter to Colonel Ney, and in dismissing the ministers who planned the expedition. The president being quoted as authority, the agent of the executive thought it useless to hold the argument any longer, and backed out. The gentlemen of the police knew nothing of bush-fighting, and might have exclaimed with the muse in Romeo, 'Is this poultice for my aching bones?'" The upshot of the examination was, that the pamphlet was untouched, and M. Blank remained in Paris. But he was watched closer than ever. When I left him, he was waiting in daily expectation of a _coup de etat_ on the part of Louis Napoleon. I asked him what hopes there were for France. He shook his head sadly--he despaired of success. It might be that Napoleon would be beaten down by the populace, if he attempted to erect a throne, but he had faint hopes of it, for he had got the army almost completely under his influence. Or it was possible that Napoleon might not violate his solemn oaths to support the republic--not for lack of disposition, but fearing the people. I could see, however, that my friend had little faith in the immediate future of "poor France," as he called her, as if she were his mother. He thought the reason why the republic would be overthrown, was from the conduct of those who had been at its head in the early part of its history. The republicans, soon after Louis Philippe's flight, acted, he thought, with great weakness. If strong men had been at the helm, then no such man as Louis Napoleon would have been allowed afterward to take the presidential chair. I think he was more right than wrong. A vigorous and not too radical administration, might have preserved the republic for years--possibly for all time. Louis Napoleon should not have been allowed to enter France, nor any
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Napoleon

 

France

 
expedition
 
thought
 
republic
 

president

 

princes

 

police

 

allowed

 

radical


completely

 

influence

 

violate

 

support

 

solemn

 
vigorous
 

administration

 
despaired
 

success

 
beaten

preserved

 

throne

 
disposition
 

attempted

 

populace

 

possibly

 

history

 

republicans

 

conduct

 

weakness


flight

 
strong
 

Philippe

 

afterward

 

presidential

 

friend

 

people

 

future

 

reason

 

overthrown


mother

 

called

 

fearing

 

objected

 

remarked

 

recognized

 
written
 
prince
 
listened
 

extracts