FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841  
1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   >>   >|  
tion with General Grant on the 30th, relative to the suspension of operations because of the mud, I asked him to let me have the Sixth Corps to help me in breaking in on the enemy's right, but that it could not be sent me; it will be recalled also that the Fifth Corps was afterward tendered and declined. From these facts it has been alleged that I was prejudiced against General Warren, but this is not true. As we had never been thrown much together I knew but little of him. I had no personal objection to him, and certainly could have none to his corps. I was expected to do an extremely dangerous piece of work, and knowing the Sixth Corps well--my cavalry having campaigned with it so successfully in the Shenandoah Valley, I naturally preferred it, and declined the Fifth for no other reason. But the Sixth could not be given, and the turn of events finally brought me the Fifth after my cavalry, under the most trying difficulties, had drawn the enemy from his works, and into such a position as to permit the realization of General Grant's hope to break up with my force Lee's right flank. Pickett's isolation offered an opportunity which we could not afford to neglect, and the destruction of his command would fill the measure of General Grant's expectations as well as meet my own desires. The occasion was not an ordinary one, and as I thought that Warren had not risen to its demand in the battle, I deemed it injudicious and unsafe under the critical conditions existing to retain him longer. That I was justified in this is plain to all who are disposed to be fair-minded, so with the following extract from General Sherman's review of the proceedings of the Warren Court, and with which I am convinced the judgment of history will accord, I leave the subject: "....It would be an unsafe and dangerous rule to hold the commander of an army in battle to a technical adherence to any rule of conduct for managing his command. He is responsible for results, and holds the lives and reputations of every officer and soldier under his orders as subordinate to the great end--victory. The most important events are usually compressed into an hour, a minute, and he cannot stop to analyze his reasons. He must act on the impulse, the conviction, of the instant, and should be sustained in his conclusions, if not manifestly unjust. The power to command men, and give vehement impulse to their joint action, is something which cannot be de
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841  
1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

General

 

Warren

 
command
 

cavalry

 

dangerous

 

events

 

impulse

 

unsafe

 

declined

 

battle


judgment

 
history
 
existing
 

conditions

 
critical
 
accord
 

demand

 

subject

 

deemed

 

injudicious


justified

 

minded

 

commander

 

extract

 

Sherman

 

retain

 

disposed

 

longer

 

proceedings

 
review

convinced

 

orders

 
instant
 

sustained

 

conclusions

 
conviction
 

analyze

 
reasons
 

manifestly

 
action

vehement

 

unjust

 

minute

 
results
 

reputations

 

responsible

 
managing
 

technical

 

adherence

 
conduct