FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840  
1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   >>   >|  
n the order to have been made against him, and I understand through the daily press that my official report of the battle of Five Forks has been submitted by him as a basis of inquiry. "If it is proposed to inquire, either directly or indirectly, as to any action of mine so far as the commanding general Fifth Army Corps was concerned, or my motives for such action, I desire to be specifically informed wherein such action or transaction is alleged to contain an accusation or imputation to become a subject of inquiry, so that, knowing what issues are raised, I may intelligently aid the Court in arriving at the facts. "It is a long time since the battle of Five Forks was fought, and during the time that has elapsed the official reports of that battle have been received and acknowledged by the Government; but now, when the memory of events has in many instances grown dim, and three of the principal actors on that field are dead--Generals Griffin, Custer, and Devin, whose testimony would have been valuable--an investigation is ordered which might perhaps do injustice unless the facts pertinent to the issues are fully developed. "My duties are such that it will not be convenient for me to be present continuously during the sessions of the Court. In order, however, that everything may be laid before it in my power pertinent to such specific issues as are legally raised, I beg leave to introduce Major Asa Bird Gardner as my counsel. "Very respectfully, "P. H. SHERIDAN, Lieut.-General." Briefly stated, in my report of the battle of Five Forks there were four imputations concerning General Warren. The first implied that Warren failed to reach me on the 1st of April, when I had reason to expect him; the second, that the tactical handling of his corps was unskillful; the third, that he did not exert himself to get his corps up to Gravelly Run Church; and the fourth, that when portions of his line gave way he did not exert himself to restore confidence to his troops. The Court found against him on the first and second counts, and for him on the third and fourth. This finding was unsatisfactory to General Warren, for he hoped to obtain such an unequivocal recognition of his services as to cast discredit on my motives for relieving him. These were prompted by the conditions alone--by the conduct of General Warren as described, and my consequent lack of confidence in him. It will be remembered that in my conversa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1816   1817   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840  
1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Warren

 
General
 

battle

 

action

 

issues

 

motives

 

fourth

 

raised

 

confidence

 

official


inquiry

 

report

 

pertinent

 

failed

 

implied

 

introduce

 

legally

 

specific

 

Gardner

 

counsel


stated

 

Briefly

 

imputations

 

SHERIDAN

 

respectfully

 

Gravelly

 

services

 

discredit

 
relieving
 

recognition


unequivocal

 

unsatisfactory

 
obtain
 

prompted

 

remembered

 

conversa

 

consequent

 

conditions

 

conduct

 

finding


unskillful

 

handling

 
reason
 

expect

 

tactical

 
Church
 

troops

 

counts

 

restore

 
portions