FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   >>  
Junius applies epithets of familiarity are Welbore Ellis, Esq., Lord Barrington, Messrs. Rigby, Whateley, Bradshaw, and Chamier." Taylor then proves Junius to have been familiar with Whateley by a long quotation from miscellaneous letters, one without a signature, and one signed _Henricus_. See Taylor's Junius Identified, page 54. In this connection comes a very important disclosure in regard to Mr. _Grenville_. I will quote Taylor, page 54: "Comparing these indications of personal acquaintance with the opportunities afforded Sir P. Francis, we find that Mr. George Grenville was one of the secretaries of state at the time Sir Philip Francis held that place in the Secretary of State's office, which had been given him by Lord Holland, and Mr. Whateley was then Mr. Grenville's private secretary. This contiguity of station would afford Sir Philip Francis frequent opportunities of acquiring all that _intimate_ and _ocular_ knowledge of Mr. Whateley which is evinced by Junius." That is, which is evinced by Junius in the letter signed "_Henricus_," and the one _without_ signature, and which are not in the genuine edition. But Mr. Taylor proves too much; for then Junius, if he were Sir Philip Francis, would also have been acquainted with Grenville, as Francis doubtless was, and there is nothing to hinder Grenville from becoming acquainted with Francis, where there is such "_intimacy_" between Grenville's _private secretary_ and Francis, and where there is such "_contiguity of station_." Let us now produce positive proof on the other side from a _genuine_ letter. Letter 18 says: "It is not my design to enter into a formal vindication of Mr. Grenville upon his own principles. I have neither the honor of being _personally known to him_, nor do I pretend to be completely master of the facts." But if Francis was Junius, this statement could not be true. While I am upon this subject of personal knowledge and acquaintance, let me bring forward something against Francis. It is well known that he attended school for about three years with Mr. Woodfall, and that a friendship strong and intimate existed between them through life. Put over against this, from private note to Woodfall, No. 17, the following: "I doubt much whether I shall ever have the pleasure of knowing you; but if things take the turn I expect, you shall know _me by my works_." The italics are his own. Here is a positive statement that Junius did not know Woodfall, and an
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   >>  



Top keywords:

Francis

 

Junius

 
Grenville
 

Whateley

 
Taylor
 

Woodfall

 

private

 
Philip
 

intimate

 

evinced


knowledge

 

statement

 

contiguity

 
secretary
 

letter

 

station

 
positive
 

opportunities

 

acquainted

 

genuine


Henricus
 

personal

 
signature
 
acquaintance
 

proves

 
signed
 

personally

 

expect

 

pretend

 

things


formal

 

design

 

vindication

 
knowing
 

principles

 

italics

 

attended

 

school

 

forward

 

existed


strong

 

friendship

 
master
 

completely

 

subject

 

pleasure

 

afforded

 

indications

 

Comparing

 
Welbore