FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>   >|  
we have q = [alpha]n0^2 + i/ed. If X0 be the value of X when x = 0, kX0n0e = i, and, kX0^2 i^2 [alpha] i^2 C = ----- = ------------ = --------- . -------- (2). 8[pi] n0^2ke.8[pi] 8[pi]ke^2 q + i/ed Since [alpha]/8[pi]ke is, as we have seen, less than unity, C will be small compared with il, if i/(eq + i/d) is small compared with l. If I0 is the saturation current, q = I0/ed, so that the former expression = id/(I0 + i), if i is small compared with I0, this expression is small compared with d, and therefore _a fortiori_ compared with l, so that we are justified in this case in using equation (1). From equation (2) we see that the current increases as the square of the potential difference. Here an increase in the potential difference produces a much greater percentage increase than in conduction through metals, where the current is proportional to the potential difference. When the ionization is distributed through the gas, we have seen that the current is approximately proportional to the square root of the potential, and so increases more slowly with the potential difference than currents through metals. From equation (1) the current is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance between the electrodes, so that it falls off with great rapidity as this distance is increased. We may note that for a given potential difference the expression for the current does not involve q, the rate of production of the ions at the electrode, in other words, if we vary the ionization the current will not begin to be affected by the strength of the ionization until this falls so low that the current is a considerable fraction of the saturation current. For the same potential difference the current is proportional to k, the velocity under unit electric force of the ion which carries the current. As the velocity of the negative ion is greater than that of the positive, the current when the ionization is confined to the neighbourhood of one of the electrodes will be greater when that electrode is made cathode than when it is anode. Thus the current will appear to pass more easily in one direction than in the opposite. Since the ions which carry the current have to travel all the way from one electrode to the other, any obstacle which is impervious to these ions will, if placed between the electrodes, stop the curre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99  
100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

current

 
potential
 
difference
 

compared

 
proportional
 
ionization
 
equation
 

electrode

 

expression

 

greater


electrodes
 

metals

 

velocity

 

increase

 
square
 
increases
 

distance

 

saturation

 

affected

 
considerable

fraction
 

electric

 

strength

 

travel

 
obstacle
 

impervious

 

opposite

 
direction
 

positive

 
confined

negative
 

carries

 

neighbourhood

 

easily

 

cathode

 
distributed
 

justified

 

fortiori

 

produces

 
kX0n0e

percentage

 

increased

 

rapidity

 

production

 
involve
 

conduction

 

approximately

 
inversely
 

currents

 

slowly