FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>   >|  
he positive ion is to that of the negative ion. Thus the force at the negative plate is greater than that at the positive. The falls of potential V1, V2 at the two layers when 1/[epsilon] is large can be shown to be given by the equations /[epsilon]\^3/2 /k1\^1/2 V1 = 8[pi]^2( --------- ) k1 ( -- ) i^2, \q [alpha]/ \k2/ /[epsilon]\^3/2 /k2\^1/2 V2 = 8[pi]^2( --------- ) k2 ( -- ) i^2, \q [alpha]/ \k1/ hence V1/V2 = k1^2/k2^2, so that the potential falls at the electrodes are proportional to the squares of the velocities of the ions. The change in potential across the layers is proportional to the square of the current, while the potential change between the layers is proportional to the current, the total potential difference between the plates is the sum of these changes, hence the relation between V and i will be of the form V = Ai + Bi^2. Mie (_Ann. der. Phys._, 1904, 13, P. 857) has by the method of successive approximations obtained solutions of equation (8) (i.) when the current is only a small fraction of the saturation current, (ii.) when the current is nearly saturated. The results of his investigations are represented in fig. 12, which represents the distribution of electric force along the path of the current for various values of the current expressed as fractions of the saturation current. It will be seen that until the current amounts to about one-fifth of the maximum current, the type of solution is the one just indicated, i.e. the electric force is constant except in the neighbourhood of the electrodes when it increases rapidly. Though we are unable to obtain a general solution of the equation (8), there are some very important special cases in which that equation can be solved without difficulty. We shall consider two of these, the first being that when the current is saturated. In this case there is no loss of ions by recombination, so that using the same notation as before we have d --(n1k1X) = q, dx d --(n2k2X) = -q. dx The solutions of which if q is constant are n1k1X = qx, n2k2X = I/e - qx = q(l - x), if l is the distance between the plates, and x = 0 at the positive electrode. Since dX/dx = 4[pi](n1 - n2)e, we get 1 dX^2 / 1 1 \ l
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

current

 
potential
 

equation

 

proportional

 

epsilon

 

positive

 

layers

 

plates

 
saturated
 

constant


solution

 

electric

 

solutions

 

saturation

 

negative

 
change
 

electrodes

 

Though

 
unable
 

general


obtain

 

maximum

 

important

 

increases

 
neighbourhood
 

rapidly

 

recombination

 

notation

 

distance

 

electrode


solved

 

difficulty

 
special
 
fraction
 

relation

 

difference

 

greater

 

square

 

velocities

 

squares


equations

 
represents
 

distribution

 

values

 

expressed

 

amounts

 

fractions

 

obtained

 
approximations
 
method