FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   >>  
make "our" mag like the other S.-F. mags on the market, and I read Astounding Stories because it is DIFFERENT, and I mean every one of those capitals!--Ben Smith, Box 444, Billings, Mont. Mr. Ernst's Answers: (a) No, it has not been actually proved. It has been indicated mathematically (by formulae based on conjecture), but never actually solved--for the very good reason that it is impossible to reproduce spacial conditions in earthly laboratories. Know how an explosive force would react in space? We don't even know positively what space is, let alone how our chemicals and instruments would behave in it. The majority theory is that explosive charges would propel a rocket or space ship more effectively in the (theoretical) emptiness of space, than in our atmosphere. But to my mind it is quite possible that an explosion--a violent expansion of gases causing rapid increase of pressures--would be ineffectual where there are no pressures to be increased. Might not the violently expanding gases fly forth from an exhaust vent to expand instantly, frictionlessly and impotently to the ends of the universe? In my story, "The World Behind the Moon," I assumed that would occur. And no man living is in a position positively to disprove it. And, as a corollary, if a propulsion explosion cannot have effect in empty space, as presumed in the story, the space ship must enter atmosphere before it can stop by firing its bow tubes. Otherwise, with the bow tubes shooting their expanding gases futilely into nothingness, you could go into "reverse" till the cows came home and the ship would hurtle forward just the same. (b) Friction of a bullet through a rifle barrel produces a temperature considerably higher than "tropical." (c) Again, no one knows spacial or planetary conditions. It seems reasonable to assume that a planet's mass may have a fairly direct bearing on the density of its atmosphere. However, Venus, a smaller globe than Earth, is supposed to have a denser atmosphere. For all we know to the contrary, meteors no larger than pebbles may carry about with them microscopic films of "atmospheres" of varying densities.--Paul Ernst. _Hitting Our Stride_ Dear Editor: The more I read Astounding Stories, the more
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   >>  



Top keywords:

atmosphere

 

spacial

 

conditions

 

positively

 

explosion

 
expanding
 
pressures
 

explosive

 

Stories

 

Astounding


shooting

 

futilely

 

atmospheres

 

living

 
varying
 

Otherwise

 

position

 

nothingness

 

reverse

 
microscopic

densities
 

Editor

 
presumed
 

corollary

 

effect

 

Stride

 
firing
 

Hitting

 

disprove

 

propulsion


larger

 

planetary

 

supposed

 

reasonable

 

tropical

 

denser

 

assume

 

planet

 

density

 

However


smaller

 

bearing

 

direct

 

fairly

 

higher

 

forward

 

meteors

 
hurtle
 

pebbles

 

Friction