FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404  
405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   >>   >|  
space. The _effective_ perception of this fact[1199] amounted to a discovery, as Olmsted and Twining, who had "simultaneous ideas" on the subject, were the first to realize. Denison Olmsted was then Professor of Mathematics in Yale College. He showed early in 1834[1200] that the emanation of the showering meteors from a fixed "radiant" proved their approach to the earth along nearly parallel lines, appearing to diverge by an effect of perspective; and that those parallel lines must be sections of orbits described by them round the sun and intersecting that of the earth. For the November phenomenon was now seen to be a periodical one. On the same night of the year 1832, although with less dazzling and universal splendour than in America in 1833, it had been witnessed over great part of Europe and in Arabia. Olmsted accordingly assigned to the cloud of cosmical particles (or "comet," as he chose to call it), by terrestrial encounters with which he supposed the appearances in question to be produced, a period of about 182 days; its path a narrow ellipse, meeting, near its farthest end from the sun, the place occupied by the earth on November 12. Once for all, then, as the result of the star-fall of 1833, the study of luminous meteors became an integral part of astronomy. Their membership of the solar system was no longer a theory or a conjecture--it was an established fact. The discovery might be compared to, if it did not transcend in importance, that of the asteroidal group. "C'est un nouveau monde planetaire," Arago wrote,[1201] "qui commence a se reveler a nous." Evidences of periodicity continued to accumulate. It was remembered that Humboldt and Bonpland had been the spectators at Cumana, after midnight on November 12, 1799, of a fiery shower little inferior to that of 1833, and reported to have been visible from the equator to Greenland. Moreover, in 1834 and some subsequent years, there were waning repetitions of the display, as if through the gradual thinning-out of the meteoric supply. The extreme irregularity of its distribution was noted by Olbers in 1837, who conjectured that we might have to wait until 1867 to see the phenomenon renewed on its former scale of magnificence.[1202] This was the first hint of a thirty-three or thirty-four year period. The falling stars of November did not alone attract the attention of the learned. Similar appearances were traditionally associated with August 10 by the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404  
405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
November
 

Olmsted

 
phenomenon
 

meteors

 

parallel

 

period

 
appearances
 

discovery

 
thirty
 
Evidences

periodicity

 

continued

 

midnight

 

Cumana

 

spectators

 
Bonpland
 

Humboldt

 

accumulate

 

remembered

 

planetaire


compared

 

established

 
transcend
 

importance

 
asteroidal
 

conjecture

 
theory
 

system

 

longer

 
commence

nouveau
 

reveler

 

magnificence

 

renewed

 

traditionally

 

Similar

 

August

 

learned

 

attention

 

falling


attract

 

conjectured

 

subsequent

 
membership
 
waning
 

Moreover

 

Greenland

 

inferior

 

reported

 
visible