FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273  
274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   >>   >|  
f merit. These are _The Duchess of Malfi_, _The White Devil_, _The Devil's Law Case_, and _Appius and Virginia_. Of _Appius and Virginia_ the best thing to be said is to borrow Sainte-Beuve's happy description of Moliere's _Don Garcie de Navarre_, and to call it an _essai pale et noble_. Webster is sometimes very close to Shakespere; but to read _Appius and Virginia_, and then to read _Julius Caesar_ or _Coriolanus_, is to appreciate, in perhaps the most striking way possible, the universality which all good judges from Dryden downwards have recognised in the prince of literature. Webster, though he was evidently a good scholar, and even makes some parade of scholarship, was a Romantic to the core, and was all abroad in these classical measures. _The Devil's Law Case_ sins in the opposite way, being hopelessly undigested, destitute of any central interest, and, despite fine passages, a mere "salmagundi." There remain the two famous plays of _The White Devil_ or _Vittoria Corombona_ and _The Duchess of Malfi_--plays which were rarely, if ever, acted after their author's days, and of which the earlier and, to my judgment, better was not a success even then, but which the judgment of three generations has placed at the very head of all their class, and which contain magnificent poetry. I have said that in my judgment _The White Devil_ is the better of the two; I shall add that it seems to me very far the better. Webster's plays are comparatively well known, and there is no space here to tell their rather intricate arguments. It need only be said that the contrast of the two is striking and unmistakable; and that Webster evidently meant in the one to indicate the punishment of female vice, in the other to draw pity and terror by the exhibition of the unprevented but not unavenged sufferings of female virtue. Certainly both are excellent subjects, and if the latter seem the harder, we have Imogen and Bellafront to show, in the most diverse material, and with the most diverse setting possible, how genius can manage it. With regard to _The White Devil_, it has been suggested with some plausibility that it wants expansion. Certainly the action is rather crowded, and the recourse to dumb show (which, however, Webster again permitted himself in _The Duchess_) looks like a kind of shorthand indication of scenes that might have been worked out. Even as it is, however, the sequence of events is intelligible, and the presentation o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273  
274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Webster

 

judgment

 

Duchess

 

Appius

 

Virginia

 

Certainly

 
evidently
 
diverse
 

female

 

striking


comparatively

 

punishment

 

exhibition

 

unprevented

 

terror

 

arguments

 

unavenged

 

contrast

 

intricate

 
unmistakable

genius

 

shorthand

 

indication

 

recourse

 

permitted

 

scenes

 

events

 

intelligible

 
presentation
 

sequence


worked

 

crowded

 

action

 

harder

 

Imogen

 
Bellafront
 

virtue

 

excellent

 

subjects

 

material


setting

 
suggested
 

plausibility

 

expansion

 

regard

 

manage

 
sufferings
 

Coriolanus

 

universality

 
Caesar