tself on his
particular account.

At this point he was met by angry cries of dissent, which did not
come from the Opposition alone. His lips set, he would not yield.
The Government could not hold itself responsible for Claridge Pasha's
relief, nor in any sense for his present position. However, from motives
of humanity, it would make representations in the hope that the Egyptian
Government would act; but it was not improbable, in view of past
experiences of Claridge Pasha, that he would extricate himself from his
present position, perhaps had done so already. Sympathy and sentiment
were natural and proper manifestations of human society, but governments
were, of necessity, ruled by sterner considerations. The House must
realise that the Government could not act as though it were wholly a
free agent, or as if its every move would not be matched by another move
on the part of another Power or Powers.

Then followed a brilliant and effective appeal to his own party to trust
the Government, to credit it with feeling and with a due regard for
English prestige and the honour brought to it by Claridge Pasha's
personal qualities, whatever might be thought of his crusading
enterprises. The party must not fall into the trap of playing the game
of the Opposition. Then, with some supercilious praise of the "worthy
sentiments" of Jasper Kimber's speech and a curt depreciation of its
reasoning, he declared that: "No Government can be ruled by clamour. The
path to be trodden by this Government will be lighted by principles
of progress and civilisation, humanity and peace, the urbane power
of reason, and the persuasive influence of just consideration for the
rights of others, rather than the thunder and the threat of the cannon
and the sword!"

He sat down amid the cheers of a large portion of his party, for the end
of his speech had been full of effective if meretricious appeal. But the
debate that followed showed that the speech had been a failure. He had
not uttered one warm or human word concerning Claridge Pasha, and it was
felt and said, that no pledge had been given to insure the relief of the
man who had caught the imagination of England.

The debate was fierce and prolonged. Eglington would not agree to any
modification of his speech, to any temporising. Arrogant and insistent,
he had his way, and, on a division, the Government was saved by a mere
handful of votes--votes to save the party, not to indorse Eglington's
speec