FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   >>  
to greater heights. As for Mr. C. E. Bush: I am also amazed by some of the letters in "The Readers' Corner," but not from those who take their literature too seriously. Rather, from those who write letters such as his. If he doesn't care whether a story is scientifically possible or not, why, then, doesn't he read Anderson's Fairy Tales or some of the Oz books?--Jim H. Nicolson, 40 Lunado Way, San Francisco, Calif. "_Shrewd," Yet Somehow Obtuse!_ Dear Editor: I like your magazine. By this, I do not mean that it is the best Science Fiction periodical, for it assuredly is not; but it is the most reliable. I am sure when I pick up your magazine that I shall find therein consistently interesting stories. I have yet to find a story that failed to hold my attention; on the other hand, I have yet to find a masterpiece. Of all the Editors, you have shown yourself the shrewdest judge of public taste, but also the least interested in the advancement of Science Fiction. Your authors are among the leading lights in Science Fiction; yet, strangely, the days when they submit their offerings to Astounding Stories seem to be "off days." Not one of them has given us a story to equal his best for the other magazines. For instance, Ray Cummings has yet to write a story for you as entertaining as "The Girl in the Golden Atom" or his others. Speaking of Cummings, I wish he would take a course in grammar. His grammatical atrocities--such as sentences without predicates--are eye-wracking. The main purpose of this letter, however, is to offer a fervent plea for reprints. I am unalterably opposed to your short-sighted policy in regard to the reprinting of old Science Fiction tales long out of print. You made an utterly asinine statement when you declared that 99 per cent of your readers have already read these classics. [We did not say that. We said: "Would it be fair to 99 per cent of our Readers to force on them reprint novels they have already read, or had a chance to read?"--Ed.] I am willing to wager that the percentage is nearer 10 per cent. For instance, can a baby read magazines? You seem to grant them this strange ability. Most of the stories that should be reprinted were published from eight to fifteen years ago, in o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   >>  



Top keywords:

Fiction

 

Science

 

magazines

 
magazine
 
instance
 

Cummings

 
stories
 

letters

 

Readers

 

purpose


letter
 

predicates

 

wracking

 

fervent

 

reprints

 
fifteen
 

published

 

Speaking

 

Golden

 
reprinted

entertaining

 
atrocities
 

sentences

 

grammatical

 

unalterably

 

grammar

 

classics

 
readers
 

percentage

 

declared


nearer

 

reprint

 

novels

 

chance

 

statement

 

asinine

 

ability

 

reprinting

 

regard

 

sighted


policy

 

utterly

 

strange

 

opposed

 

Nicolson

 

Lunado

 
Francisco
 

Editor

 

Obtuse

 

Somehow