FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248  
249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   >>   >|  
it seem, perhaps, that a tight stricture existed in this situation, to match which the smaller instrument, f f, was afterwards passed in the course marked out. [Illustration] Plate 59.--Figure 12. Figs. 1 to 5, Plate 60, represent a series of prostates, in which the third lobe gradually increases in size. In Fig. 1, which shows the healthy state of the neck of the bladder, unmarked by the prominent lines which are said to bound the space named "trigone vesical," or by those which indicate the position of the "muscles of the ureters," the third lobe does not exist. In Fig. 2 it appears as the uvula vesicae, a. In Fig. 3 the part a is increased, and under the name now of third lobe is seen to contract and bend upwards the prostatic canal. In Fig. 4 the effect which the growth of the lobe, a, produces upon the form of the neck of the bladder becomes more marked, and the part presenting perforations, e e, produced by instruments, indicates that by its shape it became an obstacle to the egress of the urine as well as to the entrance of instruments. A calculus of irregular form is seen to lodge behind the third lobe, and to be out of the reach of the point of a sound, supposing this to enter the bladder over the apex of the lobe. In Fig. 5 the three lobes are enlarged, but the third is most so, and while standing on a narrow pedicle attached to the floor of the prostate, completely blocks up the neck of the bladder. [Footnote] [Illustration] Plate 60.--Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 [Footnote: On comparing this series of figures, it must appear that the third lobe of the prostate is the product of diseased action, in so far at least as an unnatural hypertrophy of a part may be so designated. It is not proper to the bladder in the healthy state of this organ, and where it does manifest itself by increase it performs no healthy function in the economy. When Home, therefore, described this part as a new fact in anatomy, he had in reality as little reason for so doing as he would have had in naming any other tumour, a thing unknown to normal anatomy. Langenbeck (Neue Bibl. b. i. p. 360) denies its existence in the healthy state. Cruveilhier (Anat. Pathog. liv. xxvii.) deems it incorrect to reckon a third lobe as proper to the healthy bladder.] Fig. 6, Plate 60.--The prostatic canal is bent upwards by the enlarged third lobe to such a degree as to form a right angle with the membranous part of the canal. A bougie is
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248  
249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
bladder
 

healthy

 

prostate

 

proper

 

anatomy

 

Illustration

 

marked

 

prostatic

 

upwards

 
instruments

enlarged

 

Footnote

 

series

 

performs

 

economy

 

function

 

increase

 
attached
 
product
 
diseased

action

 

Figures

 

comparing

 

figures

 

manifest

 

designated

 

hypertrophy

 

blocks

 
unnatural
 

completely


incorrect
 
Pathog
 

denies

 
existence
 
Cruveilhier
 
reckon
 

membranous

 

bougie

 
degree
 
pedicle

reason
 

reality

 

naming

 
Langenbeck
 
normal
 

unknown

 

tumour

 

prominent

 

unmarked

 

trigone