FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122  
123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   >>   >|  
f distinct vision, and at the same time to retain undiminished the angle it subtends at the eye, or, what amounts to the same thing, the actual size of the image formed on the retina.[22] It follows, therefore, that if a lens be of such short focus that it allows us to see an object clearly at a distance of two inches--that is, one-fifth of the least distance of distinct vision--we shall get an image on the retina five times larger in diameter than would be possible without the lens. The two simple diagrams (Figs. 121 and 122) show why the image to be magnified should be nearer to the lens than the principal focus, F. We have already seen (Fig. 109) that rays coming from a point in the principal focal plane emerge as a parallel pencil. These the eye can bring to a focus, because it normally has a curvature for focussing parallel rays. But, owing to the power of "accommodation," it can also focus _diverging_ rays (Fig. 121), the eye lens thickening the necessary amount, and we therefore put our magnifying glass a bit nearer than F to get full advantage of proximity. If we had the object _outside_ the principal focus, as in Fig. 122, the rays from it would converge, and these could not be gathered to a sharp point by the eye lens, as it cannot _flatten_ more than is required for focussing parallel rays. [Illustration: FIG. 121.] [Illustration: FIG. 122.] USE OF THE SIMPLE MICROSCOPE IN THE TELESCOPE. [Illustration: FIG. 123.] Let us now turn to Fig. 123. At A is a distant object, say, a hundred yards away. B is a double convex lens, which has a focal length of twenty inches. We may suppose that it is a lens in a camera. An inverted image of the object is cast by the lens at C. If the eye were placed at C, it would distinguish nothing. But if withdrawn to D, the least distance of distinct vision,[23] behind C, the image is seen clearly. That the image really is at C is proved by letting down the focussing screen, which at once catches it. Now, as the focus of the lens is twice _d_, the image will be twice as large as the object would appear if viewed directly without the lens. We may put this into a very simple formula:-- Magnification = focal length of lens -------------------- _d_ [Illustration: FIG. 124.] In Fig. 124 we have interposed between the eye and the object a small magnifying glass of 2-1/2-inch focus, so that the eye can now clearly see the imag
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122  
123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

object

 

Illustration

 

principal

 

distance

 

parallel

 

focussing

 

vision

 

distinct

 

simple

 
nearer

length
 

magnifying

 

inches

 
retina
 

suppose

 

double

 
twenty
 

convex

 
MICROSCOPE
 

SIMPLE


TELESCOPE
 

distant

 

camera

 

hundred

 

interposed

 

catches

 

Magnification

 

screen

 

formula

 

directly


viewed

 

letting

 

proved

 
distinguish
 

inverted

 

withdrawn

 

magnified

 
actual
 

amounts

 
coming

subtends
 
diagrams
 

formed

 

diameter

 

larger

 

emerge

 

undiminished

 

proximity

 
advantage
 

converge