FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  
] See Rhys David's Buddhism, p. 25. [159:6] See Cox: Aryan Myths, vol. ii. p. 31. CHAPTER XVII. THE GENEALOGY OF CHRIST JESUS. The biographers of Jesus, although they have placed him in a position the most humiliating in his infancy, and although they have given him poor and humble parents, have notwithstanding made him to be of _royal descent_. The reasons for doing this were twofold. First, because, according to the Old Testament, the expected Messiah was to be of the seed of Abraham,[160:1] and second, because the Angel-Messiahs who had previously been on earth to redeem and save mankind had been of _royal descent_, therefore Christ Jesus must be so. The following story, taken from Colebrooke's "_Miscellaneous Essays_,"[160:2] clearly shows that this idea was general: "The last of the Jinas, Vardhamana, was _at first_ conceived by Devananda, a Brahmana. The conception was announced to her by a dream. Sekra, being apprised of his incarnation, prostrated himself and worshiped the future saint (who was in the womb of Devananda); but reflecting that _no great saint was ever born in an indigent or mendicant family_, as that of a Brahmana, Sekra commanded his chief attendant to remove the child from the womb of Devananda to that of Trisala, wife of Siddhartha, _a prince of the race of Jeswaca_, of the Kasyapa family." In their attempts to accomplish their object, the biographers of Jesus have made such poor work of it, that all the ingenuity Christianity has yet produced, has not been able to repair their blunders. The genealogies are contained in the first and third Gospels, and although they do not agree, yet, if either is right, then Jesus was _not_ the son of God, engendered by the "Holy Ghost," but the legitimate son of Joseph and Mary. In any other sense they amount to nothing. That Jesus can be of royal descent, and yet be the Son of God, in the sense in which these words are used, is a conclusion which can be acceptable to those only who believe in _alleged_ historical narratives on no other ground than that they wish them to be true, and dare not call them into question. The _Matthew_ narrator states that _all_ the generations from Abraham to David are _fourteen_, from David until the carrying away into Babylon are _fourteen_, and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Jesus are _fourteen_ generations.[161:1] Surely nothing can have a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220  
221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

fourteen

 

Devananda

 

descent

 

Abraham

 
carrying
 
Brahmana
 

Babylon

 

generations

 

family

 

biographers


Gospels

 
CHAPTER
 

legitimate

 

Joseph

 
engendered
 

contained

 
repair
 
CHRIST
 
object
 

attempts


accomplish

 

ingenuity

 
Christianity
 

blunders

 

genealogies

 
GENEALOGY
 

produced

 

amount

 
ground
 
question

Matthew
 

Surely

 
narrator
 
states
 

Buddhism

 

narratives

 

historical

 

Kasyapa

 
alleged
 

acceptable


conclusion

 
prince
 

Colebrooke

 

Miscellaneous

 

Essays

 

Christ

 

Vardhamana

 

general

 

notwithstanding

 

mankind