FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651  
652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   >>   >|  
over this difficulty, say that, "it _may_ come from the look or form of the spot itself, bald, round, and skull-like, and therefore a mound or hillock," but, if it means "_the place of bare skulls_," no such construction as the above can be put to the word. [526:1] The Martyrdom of Jesus of Nazareth, pp. 109-111. [527:1] O. B. Frothingham: The Cradle of the Christ, p. 11. The reader is referred to "Judaism: Its Doctrines and Precepts," by Dr. Isaac M. Wise. Printed at the office of the "American Israelite," Cincinnati, Ohio. [527:2] If Jesus, instead of giving himself up quietly, had _resisted_ against being arrested, there certainly would have been bloodshed, as there was on many other similar occasions. [528:1] If what is recorded In the Gospels on the subject was true, no historian of that day could fail to have noticed it, but instead of this there is _nothing_. [528:2] See Matthew, xxvii. 51-53. [529:1] See Matt. xiv. 15-22: Mark, iv. 1-3, and xi. 14; and Luke, vii. 26-37. [529:2] See Mark, xvi. 16. [529:3] This fact has at last been admitted by the most orthodox among the Christians. The Rev. George Matheson, D. D., Minister of the Parish of Innellan, and a member of the Scotch Kirk, speaking of the precept uttered by Confucius, five hundred years before the time assigned for the birth of Jesus of Nazareth ("Whatsoever ye would not that others should do unto you, do not ye unto them"), says: "That Confucius is the _author_ of this precept is undisputed, _and therefore it is indisputable that Christianity has incorporated an article of Chinese morality_. It has appeared to some as if this were to the disparagement of Christianity--as if the originality of its Divine Founder were impaired by consenting to borrow a precept from a heathen source. _But in what sense does Christianity set up the claim of moral originality?_ When we speak of the religion of Christ as having introduced into the world a purer life and a surer guide to conduct, what do we mean? Do we mean to suggest that Christianity has, _for the first time_, revealed to the world the existence of a set of self-sacrificing precepts--that here, _for the first time_, man has learned that he ought to be meek, merciful, humble, forgiving, sorrowful for sin, peaceable, and pure in heart? The proof of such a statement would destroy Christianity itself, for an _absolute original code of precepts_ would be equivalent to a foreign language. _Th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651  
652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Christianity
 

precept

 

Christ

 

Nazareth

 

precepts

 

Confucius

 
originality
 

appeared

 

morality

 

disparagement


Innellan
 

member

 

Scotch

 
author
 
hundred
 
Whatsoever
 

assigned

 
uttered
 

speaking

 

incorporated


article

 

indisputable

 

undisputed

 

Chinese

 

humble

 
merciful
 

forgiving

 
sorrowful
 

sacrificing

 

learned


peaceable

 

equivalent

 

foreign

 

language

 
original
 

absolute

 
statement
 

destroy

 

existence

 

Parish


source

 

impaired

 

Founder

 
consenting
 

borrow

 
heathen
 
religion
 

conduct

 
suggest
 
revealed