FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209  
210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   >>   >|  
he remedies for stings, it is a hard matter to tell which is the best. There is so much difference in the effect in different individuals, and the different parts of the body, as well as the depth the sting reaches, that a great variety of remedies are recommended. A person is slightly stung, and applies something as an antidote; the effect of the sting is trifling, as perhaps it would have been without anything, and the medicine is forthwith extolled as a sovereign remedy. I have been thus deceived; when slightly stung applied what I thought cured in one case, when in the next the sting might have penetrated deeper, or in some other place, and the remedy would seem to have no effect. For the last few years, I have not made any application whatever for myself, and the effect is no worse, nor even as bad as formerly. (This, I am told, is because the system is hardened, and now can resist or throw off the effects.) Among the remedies recommended, are saleratus and water, salt and water, soft-soap mixed with salt, a raw onion cut in two and one-half applied, mud or clay mixed pretty wet and changed often, tobacco wet and rubbed thoroughly to get at the strength, and cold water constantly applied. To cure the smart, the application of tobacco is strongly urged, and cold water is spoken of with equal favor to prevent the swelling. When stung in the throat, drinking often of salt and water is said will prevent serious consequences. Whether any of these remedies are applied or not, I suppose it is unnecessary to say that the sting should be pulled out as soon as practicable. CHAPTER XIX. ENEMIES OF BEES. Among the enemies of bees, there are included rats, mice, birds, toads, and insects. ARE THEY ALL GUILTY? But some of these are probably clear of any actual mischief. I strongly suspect that the spirit of destructiveness with many people is altogether too active. There are some farmers, with this principle predominant, so short-sighted, that if it was in their power they would destroy a whole class of birds, because some of them had picked a few cherries, or dug out a few hills of corn, when, at the same time, they are indebted to their activity in devouring worms, insects, &c., that would otherwise have destroyed entire crops! It will be well, therefore, before condemnation, to see if on the whole we are to be gainers or losers by an indiscriminate slaughter, without judge or jury. RATS AND M
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209  
210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

effect

 

applied

 

remedies

 

tobacco

 

insects

 

remedy

 
application
 
strongly
 

prevent

 

slightly


recommended

 

suppose

 

unnecessary

 

consequences

 

actual

 

mischief

 

suspect

 

spirit

 

GUILTY

 
Whether

pulled

 

practicable

 

CHAPTER

 

enemies

 

included

 

ENEMIES

 

destroyed

 

entire

 
indebted
 

activity


devouring

 

gainers

 

indiscriminate

 

condemnation

 

slaughter

 
principle
 

predominant

 

losers

 

sighted

 

farmers


active

 
people
 

altogether

 

cherries

 

picked

 

destroy

 
destructiveness
 

deceived

 

thought

 
sovereign